Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices
Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices refer to methods of seafood production that aim to minimize environmental impact, ensure the long-term viability of fish populations, and maintain the health of aquatic ecosystems. Sustainable fishing and aquaculture are crucial for the sustainability of the fishing industry, as well as for food security and biodiversity conservation.
Sustainable fisheries management involves implementing measures to ensure that fish populations are harvested at a sustainable rate, preventing overfishing and depletion of fish stocks. These measures include setting catch limits, enforcing fishing regulations, and protecting critical habitats. Sustainable fisheries also strive to minimize bycatch, which refers to the unintentional capture of non-target species.
Aquaculture is the farming of fish, crustaceans, mollusks, and other aquatic organisms in controlled environments. Sustainable aquaculture practices involve minimizing environmental impact and ensuring the welfare of farmed fish. This includes using feeds that do not rely on wild fish stocks, minimizing the use of antibiotics and other chemicals, and preventing escapes of farmed fish into the wild.
One approach to sustainable aquaculture is integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), which involves the cultivation of multiple species in the same system. This allows for the recycling of nutrients and waste products, reducing the environmental impact of aquaculture operations. For example, fish waste can be used as fertilizer for seaweed or shellfish, which can in turn absorb excess nutrients and improve water quality.
Another approach to sustainable aquaculture is recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), which use a closed-loop system to recycle and filter water, reducing the need for water exchange and minimizing the discharge of waste into the environment. RAS can also be used to farm species that are not well-suited to traditional aquaculture methods, such as high-value species that require specific water quality parameters.
Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices also aim to promote social responsibility and improve the livelihoods of fishing communities. This includes supporting small-scale fishers and promoting equitable access to resources. Additionally, sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices can contribute to food security, providing a reliable source of protein for communities.
Certification programs, such as the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC), provide a means for consumers to identify sustainably sourced seafood products. These certification programs have strict criteria for sustainable fishing and aquaculture practices, including the use of science-based management, minimizing environmental impact, and ensuring the long-term viability of fish populations.
In conclusion, sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices are crucial for the long-term viability of the fishing industry, as well as for the health of aquatic ecosystems and the well-being of fishing communities. Implementing sustainable practices, such as minimizing bycatch, using recirculating aquaculture systems, and promoting social responsibility, can help ensure the sustainability of seafood production and contribute to food security and biodiversity conservation.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!