Power dynamics in international human rights monitoring and accountability
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Power dynamics in international human rights monitoring and accountability
Introduction:
International human rights monitoring and accountability are crucial elements in the promotion and protection of human rights worldwide. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms is often influenced by power dynamics among different actors involved. This essay explores the complex interplay of power dynamics within the context of international human rights monitoring and accountability. It examines how power imbalances between states, international organizations, and civil society actors can impact the effectiveness, impartiality, and legitimacy of these processes.
Power Imbalances in International Human Rights Monitoring:
- a) State Sovereignty vs. Human Rights: The tension between state sovereignty and international human rights norms often creates power imbalances. States may use their sovereignty to resist external scrutiny and accountability, thereby undermining human rights monitoring efforts.
- b) Asymmetry of Resources: Developed countries and powerful states may possess more resources, technological capabilities, and diplomatic leverage, giving them an advantage in shaping the human rights agenda and influencing monitoring processes.
- c) Influence of Major Powers: Major powers, both economically and politically, often exert significant influence over international human rights mechanisms. Their involvement can shape the agenda, priorities, and outcomes of monitoring and accountability processes.
Role of International Organizations:
- a) United Nations: The United Nations plays a central role in human rights monitoring and accountability through various bodies, such as the Human Rights Council and treaty monitoring bodies. However, power imbalances among member states within these institutions can impact their impartiality and effectiveness.
- b) Regional Organizations: Regional bodies, such as the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, also engage in human rights monitoring. However, the influence of more powerful member states can impact decision-making and the implementation of recommendations.
Civil Society and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs):
- a) Advocacy and Pressure Groups: NGOs and civil society organizations play a critical role in monitoring human rights abuses, promoting accountability, and amplifying the voices of marginalized groups. However, power imbalances between well-funded NGOs and grassroots organizations can affect their ability to engage in monitoring and hold governments accountable.
- b) Access and Participation: Power dynamics can affect the participation and engagement of civil society actors in international human rights processes. Limited access to information, exclusion from decision-making spaces, and reprisals against human rights defenders can hinder their effectiveness.
Implications of Power Dynamics on Human Rights Monitoring and Accountability:
- a) Impartiality and Legitimacy: Power imbalances can compromise the impartiality and perceived legitimacy of monitoring mechanisms. States with greater power may evade scrutiny, while weaker states may face disproportionate scrutiny.
- b) Selective Enforcement: Powerful states may exert influence to prevent scrutiny of their own human rights records, leading to selective enforcement and undermining the universality of human rights standards.
- c) Normative Influence: Power dynamics can shape the interpretation and understanding of human rights norms. Powerful states may seek to redefine or prioritize certain rights, potentially undermining the universality and indivisibility of human rights.
Conclusion:
Power dynamics significantly impact international human rights monitoring and accountability. Recognizing and addressing these imbalances is crucial to ensure the effectiveness, impartiality, and legitimacy of these processes. Balancing state sovereignty, strengthening the role of civil society, and reforming international institutions can help mitigate the negative effects of power imbalances and enhance human rights protection globally.
Power dynamics in international human rights monitoring and accountability
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!