Overly concerned with fairness and equality
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Overly concerned with fairness and equality
Concerns about fairness and equality are a natural and necessary part of human society. After all, humans have long been aware of the inherent injustice that arises from the unequal distribution of resources, power, and privilege. As a result, many people have dedicated their lives to advocating for greater fairness and equality in society.
However, as with any virtue, it is possible to take concerns about fairness and equality too far. In some cases, individuals become overly concerned with these issues, to the point where their beliefs and actions actually become counterproductive. This can manifest in a number of ways, including a focus on strict egalitarianism at the expense of other values, an obsession with identity politics, and an excessive focus on perceived inequalities rather than actual ones.
One of the most common ways that people become overly concerned with fairness and equality is by focusing too heavily on strict egalitarianism. This is the belief that all people should be treated exactly the same, regardless of their individual circumstances. While this may seem like a noble goal on the surface, in practice it can lead to a number of negative consequences. For example, strict egalitarianism can result in the imposition of one-size-fits-all policies that may not take into account the unique needs and circumstances of different individuals or groups. This can actually end up being unfair, rather than fair, as it ignores the fact that some people may require more or less support than others in order to achieve the same outcomes.
Another way that people can become overly concerned with fairness and equality is through an obsession with identity politics. Identity politics is the idea that people should be primarily defined by their race, gender, sexual orientation, or other demographic characteristics, and that political action should be focused on advancing the interests of these identity groups. While identity politics can be a powerful tool for advancing the interests of marginalized groups, it can also lead to a dangerous form of tribalism, where people are encouraged to view those outside their identity group as the enemy. This can lead to a breakdown in social cohesion and a lack of empathy for those who do not share our particular identity characteristics.
Finally, some people become overly concerned with fairness and equality by focusing too heavily on perceived inequalities, rather than actual ones. For example, some people may become fixated on minor differences in income or status between different individuals or groups, without considering the broader context of social and economic inequality. This can lead to a kind of “zero-sum” thinking, where any gain for one group is seen as a loss for another. In reality, however, social and economic systems are much more complex than this, and real progress on issues of fairness and equality requires a more nuanced and systemic approach.
Ultimately, concerns about fairness and equality are important and necessary for creating a just and equitable society. However, it is important to maintain a balanced and nuanced perspective on these issues, and to avoid becoming overly fixated on any one aspect of fairness or equality to the exclusion of others. By doing so, we can work together to create a society that is truly fair and equitable for all.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Overly concerned with fairness and equality
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!