Alters perception of history and culture
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Alters perception of history and culture
Technology has altered our perception of history and culture in numerous ways. From the way we access and consume information to the way we communicate and connect with others, technology has had a profound impact on our understanding of the past and present. While technology has the potential to promote greater understanding and appreciation of history and culture, it can also alter our perceptions in ways that are not always accurate or beneficial.
One of the main ways in which technology alters our perception of history and culture is through the availability and accessibility of information. With the advent of the internet and digital media, we now have access to an unprecedented amount of information about the past and present. While this has the potential to promote greater understanding and appreciation of history and culture, it can also lead to information overload and misinformation. The sheer volume of information available can make it difficult to discern fact from fiction, and the ease with which information can be shared and disseminated can make it difficult to control the spread of misinformation.
Moreover, the way in which information is presented and consumed can also alter our perception of history and culture. Social media platforms, for example, have become powerful tools for shaping public opinion and perceptions of events. The way in which information is presented and framed on social media can shape the way we interpret and understand historical and cultural events. For example, the way in which a news story is presented on social media can influence the way we perceive the events and the people involved.
Furthermore, technology has also altered our perception of history and culture by changing the way we communicate and connect with others. Social media platforms, messaging apps, and other digital communication tools have made it easier than ever to connect with people from all over the world. While this has the potential to promote greater understanding and appreciation of different cultures and perspectives, it can also lead to the creation of echo chambers and the spread of misinformation. The ease with which we can connect with like-minded individuals can lead to the reinforcement of existing beliefs and biases, which can in turn alter our perception of history and culture.
In addition, technology has also altered our perception of history and culture by changing the way we document and preserve cultural artifacts and historical events. Digital technology has made it easier than ever to document and preserve historical and cultural artifacts, such as art, music, and literature. However, this technology also raises questions about the authenticity and integrity of these artifacts. Digital technology can make it difficult to determine the provenance of artifacts and can make it easier to create forgeries or altered versions of cultural artifacts.
Moreover, technology has also raised questions about the preservation of cultural heritage in the face of rapid technological change. As new technologies emerge and old technologies become obsolete, there is a risk that important cultural artifacts and historical events will be lost or forgotten. This can lead to a loss of cultural diversity and can alter our perception of history and culture in significant ways.
To combat these tendencies towards altered perception of history and culture, it’s important to recognize the role that technology plays in shaping our understanding of the past and present. This might involve engaging in critical thinking about the information we consume, seeking out diverse perspectives, and advocating for the preservation of cultural heritage in the face of technological change.
Moreover, we can work to use technology in ways that promote greater understanding and appreciation of history and culture. This might involve using digital tools to document and preserve cultural artifacts and historical events, using social media platforms to connect with people from different cultures and perspectives, and advocating for greater transparency and authenticity in the presentation of historical and cultural information.
In conclusion, technology has the potential to alter our perception of history and culture in numerous ways, from the availability and accessibility of information to the way we communicate and connect with others. To combat these tendencies, we need to recognize the role that technology plays in shaping our understanding of the past and present, and actively
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Alters perception of history and culture
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!