The sociology of online harassment and cyberbullying
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
The sociology of online harassment and cyberbullying
Introduction:
The rise of the internet and social media platforms has brought both opportunities and challenges to the way people communicate and interact. Unfortunately, one of the negative consequences of this digital revolution is the emergence of online harassment and cyberbullying. This essay explores the sociology of online harassment and cyberbullying, analyzing the social factors that contribute to these phenomena, their consequences on individuals and communities, and potential strategies for prevention and intervention.
Defining Online Harassment and Cyberbullying:
Online harassment encompasses a wide range of behaviors, including sending abusive messages, spreading rumors, stalking, doxing, and engaging in hate speech. Cyberbullying refers specifically to the repetitive and intentional aggressive behavior directed at an individual through digital platforms. Both online harassment and cyberbullying have become pervasive issues in contemporary society, affecting individuals of all ages, backgrounds, and social statuses.
Social Factors and Contributing Factors:
Understanding the sociology of online harassment and cyberbullying requires an examination of the underlying social factors that contribute to these behaviors. Some of these factors include anonymity and perceived anonymity online, disinhibition, diffusion of responsibility, deindividuation, social norms, power imbalances, and the influence of social networks. Each of these factors can amplify the occurrence and impact of online harassment and cyberbullying.
Individual and Community Consequences:
Online harassment and cyberbullying can have severe consequences for individuals and communities. Victims may experience emotional distress, depression, anxiety, social isolation, and even suicidal ideation. Communities can also be affected, experiencing decreased trust, cohesion, and social capital. The negative consequences of online harassment and cyberbullying can spill over into offline spaces, impacting individuals’ overall well-being and social fabric.
Gender, Race, and Intersectionality:
The experience of online harassment and cyberbullying is not homogeneous across all individuals. Gender and race play significant roles in shaping the occurrence and nature of online abuse. Women, particularly those who challenge gender norms, are more likely to be targeted with sexual harassment and gender-based violence online. Similarly, racial and ethnic minorities often face online hate speech and racism. The intersectionality of multiple identities further complicates the experiences of individuals targeted by online harassment and cyberbullying.
Prevention and Intervention Strategies:
Addressing online harassment and cyberbullying requires a multi-faceted approach involving individuals, communities, technology platforms, and policymakers. Prevention efforts should focus on promoting digital literacy, empathy, and ethical online behavior. Interventions should provide support and resources for victims, educate bystanders to intervene, and implement effective reporting and moderation systems on social media platforms. Collaboration between stakeholders is crucial to combatting online harassment and cyberbullying effectively.
Conclusion:
The sociology of online harassment and cyberbullying sheds light on the social dynamics and factors that contribute to these harmful behaviors. Recognizing the role of anonymity, disinhibition, social norms, power imbalances, and other social factors can inform strategies for prevention and intervention. By fostering a culture of empathy, digital literacy, and responsible online behavior, we can create a safer and more inclusive digital environment that mitigates the occurrence and impact of online harassment and cyberbullying.
The sociology of online harassment and cyberbullying
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |

|
 |
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!