The sociology of deviance and social control

The sociology of deviance and social control

Description/Paper Instructions

The sociology of deviance and social control

Introduction:

The sociology of deviance and social control examines how societies define and respond to behaviors that deviate from established norms and values. Deviance refers to any behavior, belief, or condition that violates societal expectations. Social control refers to the mechanisms and strategies used to enforce conformity to societal norms. This essay will explore the sociological perspective on deviance, examining its social construction, theories of deviance, and the role of social control in maintaining social order.

Social Construction of Deviance:

Deviance is not an inherent characteristic of behaviors but a social construct that varies across different societies and historical periods. Societies define what is considered deviant based on their cultural values, norms, and power dynamics. Deviance is a product of social interactions and is influenced by social, cultural, and political factors.

Theories of Deviance:

Sociologists have developed various theories to explain deviant behavior. The functionalist perspective views deviance as a functional component of society, serving to reinforce social norms and boundaries. The conflict perspective highlights how power dynamics and social inequalities contribute to the labeling of certain behaviors as deviant. Symbolic interactionism focuses on how social interactions and the labeling process shape individuals’ self-identity and subsequent behavior.

Social Control and Deviance:

Social control refers to the mechanisms and strategies used to encourage conformity and discourage deviant behavior. Social control can be formal, such as laws and legal systems, or informal, such as social norms and informal sanctions. Social control mechanisms vary across societies and can include surveillance, punishment, rehabilitation, and socialization processes.

Deviance and Social Change:

Deviant behavior can challenge existing social norms and contribute to social change. Some acts considered deviant in one era or society can later be seen as acceptable or even admirable. Movements advocating for civil rights, gender equality, and LGBTQ+ rights have challenged societal norms and contributed to significant social transformations.

Labeling Theory:

Labeling theory emphasizes the role of social reactions in the construction of deviance. According to this theory, the labeling of individuals as deviant can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, where individuals internalize the deviant label and conform to society’s expectations of their behavior. Labeling can result in stigmatization and further marginalization of individuals.

Social Control Institutions:

Social control institutions, such as the criminal justice system, educational institutions, and religious organizations, play a crucial role in regulating and responding to deviant behavior. These institutions enforce laws, establish rules, and provide mechanisms for punishment, rehabilitation, and socialization.

Deviance and Social Cohesion:

Deviance and social control are interconnected phenomena. Deviance can challenge social cohesion and stability, while social control mechanisms aim to maintain social order and prevent the breakdown of societal norms. Striking a balance between allowing individual freedom and maintaining social order is a constant challenge for societies.

Conclusion:

The sociology of deviance and social control sheds light on the complex relationship between society, deviant behavior, and social control mechanisms. Deviance is a social construct shaped by cultural, political, and historical factors. Understanding the social construction of deviance, theories of deviance, and the role of social control institutions is crucial for analyzing and addressing social inequalities, power dynamics, and the maintenance of social order.

The sociology of deviance and social control

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!