The Roots of Humanity Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Roots of Humanity Assignment
WUV – SPRING 2021
ON BEING HUMAN – JESUS WORDS OF LOVE, SERVICE, AND FREEDOM
- The Sabbath was made for Humanity, not Humanity for the Sabbath
- The Son of Man came not to be served but to Serve
- Though he was in the form of God, he did not count equality with God as something to hold onto, but emptied himself and took up the form of a Servant
- God so loved the world that he emptied himself of his Son, that whoever would believe in Him should not be left alone, but joined with others in eternal living.
HUMANITY WITHIN IDEALISM AND DUALISM
- Rene Descartes: I think therefore I am • The primary function and role of the Human Mind • Not, what is Truth, but of what can I be Certain. – My Mind as a thinking thing, My Body which houses my Mind • The secondary (and of lesser value) the function and role of the Human Body • Mind over matter
- Immanuel Kant: Transcendental Realism – Objects cannot be know in themselves, only as they are experience / appear to the individual under the circumstances of our awareness
- Space and time do not have an existence “outside” of us, but are the “subjective” forms of our sensibility and hence the necessary a priori conditions under which the objects we encounter in our experience can appear to us at all. Kant describes time and space as “empirically real” but transcendentally ideal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_priori
CHRISTOLOGY – PNEUMATOLOGY – ECCLESIOLOGY FINDING THE PERSON IN HUMANITY
- The Kantian Human – Self – Objective – Knowing – Subject / Object dilemma • Schopenhauer says of Kant’s doctrine of the ideality of space and time: “Before Kant, it may be
said, we were in time; now time is in us. In the first case, time is real and, like everything lying in time, we are consumed by it. In the second case, time is ideal; it lies within us.”
- Opposing Kantian transcendental idealism is the doctrine of philosophical realism, that is, the proposition that the world is knowable as it really is, without any consideration of the knower’s manner of knowing. Realism claims, contrary to idealism, that perceived objects exist in the way that they appear, in and of themselves, independent of a knowing spectator’s mind.
- The Object to be known determines the method of knowing it. Reality Exists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism
CHRISTOLOGY – PNEUMATOLOGY – ECCLESIOLOGY FINDING THE PERSON IN HUMANITY
- John 1:1-18 – A careful review of the relationship between Word – Flesh – Us (Incarnation) • In the beginning – all things – made – nothing that was made – life – love – grace – truth • Sin and the estrangement of darkness – the human impact – self-assessment – self-awareness
- The Kierkegaardian Human – Self – Subjective – Engaging – Thou – I • Much of his philosophical work deals with the issues of how one lives as a “single individual”,
giving priority to concrete human reality over abstract thinking and highlighting the importance of personal choice and commitment.
- John MacMurray – The Human as Agent and Humans as Persons
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction
God as Triune: Relational,
Loving, Reaching out
Self – Isolation – Estrangement –
Defensive – Alone – Tabula Raza
Other 1
HUMANITY UNDERSTOOD GRAPHICALLY THE ONE AND THE MANY
Other 1
Other 1
Other 1
Other 1
Other 1
Significant other
Self defining but Self Insecure Self at Center but seeming off center Others as objects, means, management Others as external – suspect – opaque
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!