The Role of Communication in Building Psychological Resilience
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
The Role of Communication in Building Psychological Resilience
Psychological resilience is the ability to adapt and bounce back from difficult experiences or stressors. It is a crucial aspect of mental health that helps individuals cope with challenges and maintain their well-being. Communication plays a critical role in building psychological resilience by providing a means of expressing thoughts, emotions, and needs, as well as receiving support and validation from others. In this essay, I will explore the ways in which communication can facilitate the development of psychological resilience.
One of the primary ways in which communication builds resilience is by fostering social support networks. Social support refers to the help and assistance that individuals receive from their social connections, such as family, friends, and colleagues. Research has shown that having a strong social support network is associated with higher levels of resilience, as it provides individuals with a sense of belonging, emotional support, and practical assistance. Communication plays a critical role in establishing and maintaining social support networks by enabling individuals to connect with others, express their needs and concerns, and receive emotional and practical support. For example, individuals who communicate openly with their friends and family members about their experiences and feelings are more likely to receive emotional support, which in turn can help them cope with difficult situations and build resilience.
Another way in which communication builds resilience is by facilitating problem-solving and coping strategies. Communication provides individuals with a means of expressing their thoughts and feelings, as well as receiving feedback and advice from others. This can help individuals develop problem-solving and coping strategies that can be applied in challenging situations. For example, individuals who communicate with their therapists or counselors about their experiences and feelings are more likely to develop effective coping strategies, such as mindfulness meditation or cognitive-behavioral therapy, which can help them manage stress and build resilience.
Furthermore, communication plays a critical role in building resilience by promoting positive self-talk and cognitive reframing. Positive self-talk refers to the internal dialogue that individuals use to motivate themselves, boost their self-esteem, and cope with difficult situations. Cognitive reframing refers to the process of changing the way individuals think about and interpret challenging situations. Communication can facilitate positive self-talk and cognitive reframing by providing individuals with a means of expressing their thoughts and feelings, receiving feedback and validation from others, and learning new perspectives and strategies for managing difficult situations. For example, individuals who communicate with their therapists or counselors about their negative self-talk or maladaptive thought patterns are more likely to learn effective techniques for reframing their thinking and building resilience.
In addition, communication can also build resilience by promoting emotional regulation and self-awareness. Emotional regulation refers to the ability to manage and regulate one’s emotions in response to stressors and challenges. Self-awareness refers to the ability to recognize and understand one’s own emotions, thoughts, and behaviors. Communication can promote emotional regulation and self-awareness by enabling individuals to express their emotions, receive feedback and validation from others, and learn effective techniques for managing their emotions. For example, individuals who communicate with their therapists or counselors about their emotional experiences are more likely to learn effective techniques for regulating their emotions, such as deep breathing or progressive muscle relaxation.
Finally, communication can build resilience by promoting a sense of purpose and meaning. A sense of purpose and meaning refers to the belief that one’s life has a greater significance and purpose beyond oneself. Communication can promote a sense of purpose and meaning by providing individuals with a means of connecting with others, expressing their values and beliefs, and engaging in meaningful activities. For example, individuals who communicate with their friends and family members about their shared values and interests are more likely to feel a sense of purpose and meaning, which can help them cope with difficult situations and build resilience.
In conclusion, communication plays a critical role in building psychological resilience by promoting social support networks, problem-solving and coping strategies, positive self-talk and cognitive reframing, emotional regulation and self-awareness,
The Role of Communication in Building Psychological Resilience
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!