The Leadership Challenges Research Essay Paper
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
The Leadership Challenges Research Essay Paper
This is a suggested template for the status report. It can be adapted for a Leadership In Action Project, or a Consulting Case or XN Project
You do not have to follow this template precisely, but you must provide complete and clear information about your project and your progress. Simple fill-in responses to the prompts may not result in a thorough and useful status report. Use the template for ideas about what to include, to make your report more creative and effective.
This status report should provide you and your readers with an accurate summary of what you have accomplished, and it should outline your priorities for the next several weeks. 3-4 pages should be sufficient (not including title page and attachments and addenda).
Project Status Report Suggested Template
Your name
Title of Project
Date ( You are reporting on actions, events, and progress from the beginning of the semester through the current date)
Goal Statement:
(This is the statement you use to describe and introduce your Project; you have refined it and improved it, to communicate clearly with others what you wish to do, and why it is useful and necessary.)
Challenges getting started:
Were you prepared for the Master’s Capstone course and project?
What did you do before the semester started, to develop project ideas and be prepared?
How did you select and define your Project? What was your process?
Were there any delays? Why? How did you take action to overcome these delays? What did you learn about yourself and project management and time management?
Constituents (followers, colleagues, allies, stakeholders):
With whom are you interacting? With whom are you working? How, and how frequently? What is your role and relationship with each of your key constituents? Who views you as a leader? Or student researcher? Or in some other role? (Use correct names and other accurate information.)
Key Actions
What are your major accomplishments? What have you done?
(Case study research can include interactions with sponsors and sources, reports, articles, company data, interviews, and all fact-finding necessary for case analysis.)
(Action projects can include goal setting, recruiting, and all leadership interactions and management activities)
How do these actions compare to the actions you presented in your earlier Plan document?
What modifications and improvements have you made within your Project Plan? Why?
Research:
(Also see Constituent section.)
What academic research have you done about your research topic?
What field research have you done, or are you planning with the professor now, for interviews, questionnaires, observation, etc.?
What leadership and management theories are most relevant to you with your constituent interactions and your case understanding and analysis?
Leadership approaches:
How have you tried to use and practice leadership behaviors? What leadership models have you employed? With whom? What happened? What are you learning about leading, from your direct personal experience?
What concepts that you studied in the MSL program (in addition to leadership approaches) are you using yourself or observing in others?
Issues encountered:
What leadership challenges have you encountered? (This does not include management challenges such as time zone differences, etc.)
What concerns has the professor expressed in his feedback to date? Have you responded? How
What problems have you experienced? What problem solving have you done?
How have these issues required leadership solutions? What strategies have you employed?
Next steps:
Provide an updated timetable (simple text or graphic) and a more detailed list of action items that will be required between now and the completion of the semester. These action items refer specifically to your Project (not the other course assignments).
Two timetables may be necessary if the Capstone project is for your Master’s Degree and an employer or sponsor wants another timetable. See me for clarification if necessary.
Self assessment – Examine your own efforts. Include a paragraph to address the following questions.
Are you functioning at your potential?
What might be holding you back, or slowing your progress, or reducing your confidence? What do you want to do in the next several weeks to challenge yourself and practice leadership with others?
Addenda
You may attach a sample of the kinds of communication you are initiating for this project – a memo to your colleagues, a photo, a slide or chart you shared with followers or constituents, etc.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!