the identification of stakeholders
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
the identification of stakeholders
Somarriba,
Describe the process you would follow to assess the organization where you plan to conduct our project for opportunities for improvement including the identification of stakeholders.
My project has had a few setbacks since I enrolled in this program. I was initially going to work with an obstetrician/gynecologist, a midwife, and a women’s health nurse practitioner who ran a women’s health practice. We were narrowing down project possibilities when they were involved in a motor vehicle accident. Two of them died and the survivor sustained injuries that made practicing difficult, so they sold the practice. Under the new ownership, there were no advanced practice nurses which eliminated it as a possible project site. As a result, I have elected to proceed with the case study option for my practicum project. I will be looking at using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to screen postpartum women when they bring their infant into the pediatrician’s office for routine well-child visits. Postpartum depression is a common complication of pregnancy that affects roughly 20% of women during the pregnancy, after delivery, and up to a year later (Underwood et al., 2016).
If I were going to implement this project, I would approach the pediatric practice located in a shopping center near my house. The practice has three locations across St. Johns and Duvall counties. They have pediatricians who went to medical schools or osteopathic medical schools along with pediatric nurse practitioners. My daughter has been taking her two boys there since moving to Florida in early 2020. During the routine well-child visits for her 11-month-old, there have been the occasional questions asking how she was doing but no formal screening for postpartum depression. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that a woman should have some type of contact with a maternal care provider within three of giving birth, ongoing care as indicated, and then a full evaluation prior to twelve weeks after birth (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2018). The Bright Futures/American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has established a schedule of well-child visits which includes being evaluated within 3-5 days of birth and then at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months of age (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2021). With more frequent visits to them in the months following the birth of a child, the pediatrician’s office is a great place to screen for postpartum depression and make referrals as indicated (Olin et al., 2017).
Determine the ultimate goals for your DNP project and how they relate to the organization’s mission and vision.
The goal for my practicum project is to determine the effect that implementing the EPDS to screen for postpartum depression in a pediatric setting will have on the identification and referrals for mental health support in 8-10 weeks. Rainbow Pediatric Center (2021) has a mission “to partner with parents, caregivers, and educators to raise kids into healthy, self-reliant, emotionally stable, and empathetic young adults” (para 2). Evidence-based, prevention-focused, and holistic are among the core values for the practice (Rainbow Pediatric Center, 2021, para 3). I believe that the proposed practicum project aligns quite well with their mission and vision.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2021). AAP schedule of well-child care visits. Retrieved from https://www.healthychildren.org/English/family-life/health-management/Pages/Well-Child-Care-A-Check-Up-for-Success.aspx
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (20218). Optimizing postpartum care: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736. Obstetrics and Gynecology 131: e140-150.
Olin, S. S., McCord, M., Stein, R. E. K., Kerker, B. D., Weiss, D., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2017). Beyond screening: A stepped care pathway for managing postpartum depression in pediatric settings. Journal of Women’s Health 26(9), 966-975. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6089
Rainbow Pediatric Center. (2021). About us. Retrieved from https://www.rainbowpediatriccenter.com/about-us/#core-value
Underwood, L., Waldie, K., D’Souza, S., Peterson, E. R., & Morton, S. (2016). A review of longitudinal studies on antenatal and postnatal depression. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 19, 711-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-016-0629-1
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!