The Human Right to Intergenerational Equity
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
The Human Right to Intergenerational Equity: A New Paradigm for Development
Intergenerational equity refers to the concept of fairness and justice between different generations. This principle suggests that every generation has a responsibility to leave the world a better place for future generations by ensuring that they have access to the same resources, opportunities, and benefits that are currently available.
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition that intergenerational equity is a fundamental human right. The concept of intergenerational equity is closely linked to the idea of sustainable development, which is a development model that seeks to meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
One of the key challenges facing the world today is how to balance economic development with environmental sustainability. Many of the current development models prioritize short-term economic gains at the expense of long-term environmental and social sustainability. This has led to a situation where many of the world’s natural resources are being depleted at an alarming rate, and the planet’s ecosystems are under threat.
The human right to intergenerational equity offers a new paradigm for development that places the needs of future generations at the center of decision-making. This paradigm recognizes that development must be sustainable if it is to be truly beneficial for society. It also recognizes that the impacts of our actions today will be felt by future generations and that we have a responsibility to minimize those impacts.
To ensure that intergenerational equity becomes a guiding principle for development, it is essential to embed it in legal frameworks and institutional structures. This means that governments must prioritize intergenerational equity in their policies and decision-making processes. It also means that civil society organizations and individuals must advocate for intergenerational equity and hold governments accountable for their actions.
One of the key challenges in implementing intergenerational equity is that it requires a long-term perspective that may be difficult to achieve in a world that is driven by short-term thinking. However, there are several strategies that can be used to promote intergenerational equity, including:
Education: Educating people about the importance of intergenerational equity can help to raise awareness and promote a culture of sustainability. This can be done through formal education programs as well as public awareness campaigns.
Participation: Giving people a voice in decision-making processes can help to ensure that their needs and concerns are taken into account. This can be done through participatory processes such as public consultations and community-based planning.
Innovation: Encouraging innovation and the development of new technologies can help to reduce the environmental impact of development and promote sustainability. This can be done through policies that support research and development and provide incentives for innovation.
Regulation: Regulation is an essential tool for promoting intergenerational equity. Governments can use regulations to set standards for environmental protection, promote sustainable practices, and prevent activities that harm future generations.
In conclusion, the human right to intergenerational equity offers a new paradigm for development that places the needs of future generations at the center of decision-making. To ensure that intergenerational equity becomes a guiding principle for development, it is essential to embed it in legal frameworks and institutional structures. This requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to sustainability, but the benefits of this approach are clear. By prioritizing intergenerational equity, we can create a more sustainable and just world for all.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!