Texas Land Commissioner 3 Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Texas Land Commissioner 3 Assignment
Running Head: TEXAS LAND COMMISSIONER 1
TEXAS LAND COMMISSIONER 3
OUTLINE
TEXAS LAND COMMISSIONER
Shrijana Nepali
Date: October 7, 2018
Introduction:
George Prescott Bush is an American activist who believes in loyalty, commitment and servant leadership. This paper explains the life experience of George P. Bush who is currently the land commissioner of Texas. He has been a unique leader since his childhood and there is a miraculous combination of skill and competence in his leadership. This paper covers his political career and goals that he has achieved in life.
Body:
- EARLY LIFE
George P Bush was born 1976 in Houston, Texas where he grew up. He has two younger siblings Noelle Lucille and John Ellis Bush. He went to school at the University of Texas School of law where he got a Juris doctor degree in the year 2003.
- a) Bush’s family
Bush’s father was Jep Bush the former governor of Florida.
His mother was Amanda Williams
- b) Bush’s marriage
His spouse was Amanda Williams whom he married in 2003. She was his classmate in the University of Texas School of law.
Together, they have two sons Prescott Bush born in 2013 and John Bush born in 2015.
- BUSH’S CAREER
- PoliticalCareer
- He was the first national co-chair of the Political Action Committee (PAC) that is dedicated to involving next generation of the republican voters.
- In 2012, he became the Deputy Finance Chairman of the Republican Party of Texas
- In 2014 he announced his interest in running for Office of Land Commissioner.
- Assumption of Office as The Land Commissioner Of Texas
- a) He criticized higher officers in the government for accepting bribe
- b) He served as a member of several diplomatic missions
- c) He joined the peace delegations to Saudi Arabia and turkey
CONCLUSION
Analytical Summary
The life history of George P. Bush has been a unique one in terms of championing real political activism and a fight for the people. Born in Houston, Texas he obtained a Juris doctor degree from the University of Texas where he used this education background to as a foundation for his political career. He served in various offices including being the national co-chair of the Political Action Committee; deputy finance chairman of the republican party of Texas; he became the 28th Land Commissioner of Texas (Barker, 2016).
He championed a fight for corruption by criticizing other politicians who received money as bribe. He also was a member of various peace delegations and championed for diplomacy and good leadership.
Thus, George Prescott Bush is truly and successful American activist who believes in loyalty, commitment and servant leadership.
He did not fight for his own selfless gains, but he champions true leadership and total servant hood to the people of Texas
References
Barker, E. C. (2016). Land speculation as a cause of the Texas Revolution. The Quarterly of the Texas State Historical Association, 10(1), 76-95.
Taylor, V. H. (2014). The Spanish Archives of the General Land Office of Texas. Lone Star Press.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!