Sustainable Policy and Develop Implementation Strategies
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Develop a Sustainable Policy and Develop Implementation Strategies
Part a: Develop a Sustainable Policy
Description
Writing a sustainability policy requires a clear and through understanding of business activities, environmental impact of business activities, requirements of respective laws and standards, and sustainability outcomes of an organisation. Sustainability goals are an integral part of an organisation’s strategic and business plans.
In this assessment task, you will be required to develop (write) a Sustainability Policy for an organisation your choice. Organisation can be your past or present organisation. Alternatively, you may use any organisation with a likely/expected environmental footprint. In today’s technology‐enhanced business environment, sustainability issues impact almost every organisation.
UTMOST care should be taken to avoid plagiarism – especially in lifting and using policy contents or documents from the internet.
Based on your selected organisational profile, develop;
- A brief summary of the organisation and its business activities
- Why sustainability is important for the organisation
- Specific business area/function where sustainable practices are critical
- Key sustainability principles and/or philosophy
- Policy goals and objectives
- Scope of the policy
- Key stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities
- Relevant laws and standards, including equal employment opportunity, equity and diversity principles and OHS implications of policy being developed
- Industry best practice (e.g. examples of what other similar organisations are doing in this area – at least two such organisations)
- Expected outcomes
- Methods for implementation (your recommendations)
You may use examples of policy document structures from the sample documents provided. All external sources must be cited using an appropriate referencing system.
Assessment Criteria
The following assessment criteria will be used for marking this assessment task. Ensure that you have addressed all of the criteria in your work.
- Selected and used an appropriate organisational profile/example for this task
- Outlined key business activities and their likely impact (ecological footprint) on the environment
- Sustainability principles and approaches are consistent with industry best practices and relevant laws and standards
- Policy scope defines specific business areas for sustainability initiatives, including environmental, economic and social aspects (as applicable based on the organisation type)
- The policy document is appropriate structured and presented as a formal business document
- Policy layout and contents are consistent and cover all the required policy areas
- Reference to relevant laws, standards, guidelines and approaches reflect the planned/anticipated sustainability initiatives and approaches
- Policy purpose and goals are clearly set out and reflect their relationship to company’s overall strategic priorities
- Key stakeholders are identified and their roles and responsibilities are outlined in relation to implementation and management of the policy
- Policy statement is consistent with overall sustainability goals and provides a cohesive framework for managing sustainability with the organisation
- Methods for implementation are outlined as policy options based on likely effectiveness, timeframes and cost
- Relevant laws and standards are identified and listed with appropriate links and/or references
- Policy measures are enhanced by the use of industry best practices and/or benchmarks with at least two examples
- Presentation was structured, concise and aimed at promoting the policy to the stakeholders
- Presentation covered information relevant to the stakeholders including outcomes expected, activities to be undertaken and responsibilities assigned
- Maintained positive body language, audience contact and interest Answered audience questions and gathered feedback
Part B: Develop Implementation Strategies
In this you will focus on implementing the sustainability initiatives (policy) with a view to achieve stated sustainability goals.
Team should be formed and delegate project tasks to members based on their assigned role and responsibilities.
Strategies may include (but are not limited to);
- Promotional activities
- Raising awareness among stakeholders
- Training staff in sustainability principles and techniques
Assume that your team has been given the responsibility to implement and promote the Sustainability Policy across the organisation. As your team will have access to the policy documents developed by team members in the Part a, that policy must be selected for this task.
Develop a comprehensive document that covers;
- Purpose
- Strategies for minimising resource use
- Strategies for reducing toxic material and hazardous chemical use
- Benefits of employing life cycle management approaches
- Communication plan for involving all stakeholders in the implementation process
- Procedures for implementing policy initiatives (a brief procedure for each policy initiative)
- Measures or benchmark indicators to identify the outcomes achieved (e.g. how will we know if a particular goal has been achieved)
- Key responsibilities
- Processes to collect and analyse feedback once the policy has been implemented
- Plan for continuous improvement using Deming’s PDCA cycle
You team will be expected to undertake the project work during assigned project time in training sessions. Teams will be expected to delegate roles, responsibilities, and tasks; and maintain team communication throughout.
In additional the above, teams will need to provide a team statement highlighting roles and responsibilities of team members, and a summary of contribution from each member.
The suggested strategies should be enhanced by the use of charts (e.g. likely resource consumption), flowcharts, and graphs as needed.
The final document should be word processed and structured as a formal business document reflecting a reallife approach.
Assessment Criteria
The following assessment criteria will be used for marking this assessment Part b. Ensure that you have addressed all of the criteria in your work.
Note to Assessors: Equal contribution from team members must be ensure to maintain equity and fairness in marking/grading. Groups should be encouraged to set rules on non‐attendance and under‐performing members and report any problems to the assessor at the earliest.
- Formed a team and delegated the required roles, responsibilities, and tasks
- Maintained effective team communication and participated in in‐class project work when assigned
- Team statement demonstrates cohesive and collaborative team culture; and an effective organisation of work
- Developed strategies for addressing a range of sustainability and environment issues relevant to business activities
- Life Cycle approach is highlighted with articulation of the concept supported by examples
- Described how life cycle management approach provides a more sustainable outcome as opposed to analysis of a use‐phase
- Key stakeholders are identified and their roles and responsibilities are outlined in relation to implementation and management of the policy
- Communication plan outlines a range of communication methods to engage the key stakeholders across the organisation
- Developed procedures for implementing sustainability initiatives
- Procedures provide an appropriate mechanism for implementing policy initiatives
- Individual procedures are developed for each policy measure
- Policy outcomes are evaluated against set measures or benchmarks consistent with industry best practices
- Policy implementation measures are developed with a continuous improvement focus and provide a cohesive approach towards achieving sustainability goals
- Feedback mechanisms and a plan to use the feedback data is developed with a view to monitor and continuously improve the process
- Plan for continuous monitoring and improvement of policy measures is developed using Deming’s PDCA model
- The continuous improvement process, and use of feedback back data is outlined through the PDCA model
- Used a range of visual data including charts and graphs to emphasise key details/data
- The document is appropriately structured and prepared using a Word processing or any other suitable software
- Documentation includes profiles of team members and their specific contribution to the project
- Team statement describes key team processes including team meetings
- Project tasks were identified and delegated to team members with specific responsibilities
Submission Guidelines
This task must be prepared and submitted in a word‐processed layout. Handwritten documents cannot be accepted for this task
Submit:
- A hard copy of the policy document with appropriate assessment cover sheet.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!