Strategic Sourcing Presentation Assessment – Instructions & Evaluation Criteria
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Strategic Sourcing Presentation Assessment – Instructions & Evaluation Criteria
Strategic Sourcing Presentation Assessment – Instructions & Evaluation Criteria
Prepare a 3-5 PPT slide presentation (More than 5 slides are not allowed) that covers the following criteria:
- Sourcing Approach(how you would recommend the client approach related to this project scope)
- Requirements Gathering for the Project(how you would approach gathering requirements related to this project scope)
- RFx Structure / Execution Approach(what approach you would take to the development/execution of the project)
- Evaluation(how you would evaluate suppliers relating to the project execution)
- Contracting(what contract considerations you would recommend for consideration)
You will be graded upon your ability to articulate the points listed above, the ability to provide a cohesive and structured flow to the presentation as well as client readiness / cleanliness. Specifically, the below will be the evaluation criteria:
- Sourcing Approach(your approach is clearly defined and carried throughout the document)
- Requirements Gathering for the Project(you have given clear indication of how and what requirements would be gathered)
- RFx Structure / Execution Approach(your execution approach is consistent with the rest of the presentation, it provides pertinent details)
- Evaluation(it is clear how you will evaluate suppliers in a manner consistent with your strategy)
- Contracting(you have provided a baseline for terms and conditions to be considered)
- Client Facing / Readiness(a presentation that is ready to present to and facilitate a conversation with our client, the content contained in the presentation should stand alone when reviewed by a client, this would include formatting / spelling / grammar / presentation visuals)
Strategic Sourcing Presentation Assessment – Client Case Study
A US National automotive parts & services company has 350 store locations throughout the US. Company is divided into 3 regions, Eastern, Central & Western. The National Facilities Director is looking to do a sourcing event for the Janitorial Services and Supplies across all stores. She is facing several challenges including,
- Extremely fragmented & at times very local supply base
- Lack of visibility into spend data break-down (services & supplies)
- Lack of detailed location specific data (square footage, types of surfaces etc.)
- Little coordination between headquarters (based in the Eastern region) and the store general managers
- Minimum wage might be going up in several regions
- Stores own some janitorial service equipment and there is also a central contract in place with the largest supplies supplier
- There are inconsistent brand and specifications of the supplies used at various locations, and environmental/quality control programs are not in place at every location
She is hoping to consolidate the supply base as much as possible while increasing the service levels, leverage supplies spend, get a better contracting structure in place (central versus local), get visibility into spend along with detailed breakdown & lower cost.
Current situation:
- Largest number of stores (around 50%) are in the Eastern region, Western region (~30%) and remaining are located in Central region.
- 45 different suppliers (mostly local or regional at best)
- Detailed spend data is not available. Download of local work orders is available but is unreliable. Only high-level total spend per location available.
- Total yearly spend is estimated to be $14.5M for services and supplies.
- Coverages includes:
- Perform cleaning for all types of surfaces and rooms at specified frequencies.
- Some locations have day porters for fixed number of hours per week.
- At some locations, the suppliers bring all the needed equipment and supplies; whereas, at some locations the company provides the equipment and supplies.
- SLA’s differ for each supplier and store location.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!