Space technology: Space debris and orbital sustainability
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Space technology: Space debris and orbital sustainability
Space debris, also known as space junk, refers to the collection of man-made objects in orbit around the Earth that no longer serve any useful purpose. This includes everything from spent rocket stages and defunct satellites to flecks of paint and bolts. The accumulation of space debris poses a significant threat to the safety and sustainability of space operations.
The risks of space debris are twofold: collisions with spacecraft and damage to Earth. Collisions with space debris can cause catastrophic damage to spacecraft, putting the lives of astronauts and cosmonauts at risk. In addition, the destruction of spacecraft and the creation of new debris can create a chain reaction known as the Kessler Syndrome, where the density of debris in orbit becomes so great that collisions between objects become increasingly likely, leading to the creation of even more debris and making space operations increasingly hazardous.
To mitigate the risks of space debris, a number of measures have been implemented. The most effective approach is to prevent the creation of new debris by designing satellites and spacecraft to be more resistant to collisions, and by using fuel-efficient engines that can be used to deorbit spacecraft at the end of their useful lives. In addition, the use of space debris mitigation guidelines, such as those developed by the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee, can help to reduce the amount of debris that is created by space operations.
Another approach to managing space debris is to remove existing debris from orbit. This can be achieved through a variety of methods, including capturing and deorbiting debris using robotic systems, using nets or harpoons to capture large objects, and using lasers to ablate the surfaces of smaller objects, causing them to deorbit due to atmospheric drag.
The challenge of managing space debris is compounded by the lack of international consensus on how best to address the issue. While some countries have implemented strict space debris mitigation guidelines, others have not. This has led to a situation where some areas of space are more heavily polluted with debris than others, making space operations in those areas more hazardous.
In addition to managing space debris, it is important to ensure the long-term sustainability of space operations. This involves designing spacecraft and satellites to be as sustainable as possible, using renewable energy sources, and using materials that can be recycled or reused. It also involves ensuring that space operations are conducted in an environmentally responsible manner, minimizing the impact on Earth and other celestial bodies.
The long-term sustainability of space operations also depends on international cooperation and collaboration. This includes the sharing of data and information on space debris and the development of international standards and guidelines for space operations. It also involves developing new technologies and approaches to space operations that are more sustainable and less hazardous.
In conclusion, space debris poses a significant threat to the safety and sustainability of space operations. To mitigate these risks, a range of measures are being implemented, including the prevention of new debris, the removal of existing debris, and the development of sustainable space operations. Achieving long-term sustainability in space will require international cooperation and collaboration, as well as the development of new technologies and approaches that prioritize safety and environmental responsibility.
Space technology: Space debris and orbital sustainability
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Space technology: Space debris and orbital sustainability
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!