Recommended new health information technology system
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Recommended new health information technology system
Him500 Milestone 3
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor
5th March 2022
The requirements of the organization’s varied jobs in new technology.
Because of old-fashioned technical knowledge at Featherfall Medical Center, government laws and regulations have been violated. Staff is not only out of date in terms of abilities, but also terms of technology. Disagreements in government rules, operational issues, and ethical quandaries caused by inadequate technology deployment have cost the organization money. Alert (Admission, Discharge, and Transfer ADT’) and Intel, two eligible vendors, have been chosen to meet Featherfall’s technology requirements (SOA Expressway for Healthcare).
These systems must meet three critical objectives: meet staff demands, protect healthcare integrity, and meet government criteria. Because Featherfall includes punishments for previous breaches, there are significant concerns regarding the cost of adopting and maintaining a new system. It is the correct decision to purchase a new computer system for Featherfall Medical Center. The medical center’s outmoded system has had a significant influence on the organization’s finances due to legislative requirements. Furthermore, they have difficulty maintaining the accuracy of their medical records. Some industries are plagued by a lack of training and clear communication routes. To be accepted, the new medical facility system must be user-friendly for employees, communicate well amongst itself, comply with HIPAA regulations, and adhere to legislative restrictions.
Recommended new health information technology system.
Intel is, in my opinion, the best new technology for Featherfall Medical Center (SOA Expressway for Healthcare). I feel Intel is a good fit for Featherfall Medical Center since the structure is easy to use and is possible to be rapidly integrated into normal tasks. The technology will also enable improved communication among employees. Intel’s system will generate discharge and transfer lists, making it easier to manage patient care. Furthermore, the system may generate records for patients based on their doctors and patients based on departments. The structure has numerous levels of protection and is password-protected. Despite the fact that HIPAA compliance has yet to be attained, UHDDS is in place and performing as expected. The following release will adhere to the guidelines of HIPAA (Durcevic, 2019). You may be confident that your health-related data is in capable hands because of the scale and depth of understanding of Intel.
How the organization could invest its financial resources in the recommended IT system more efficiently.
Although the Intel set-up is more expensive compared to the Alert (ADT) set-up, it has more knowledge. Intel, a company that has been in operation for 30 years and currently employs 364 medical systems. Intel paid $2,028,000 in total, while Alert paid $1,587,000. Intel cost $441,000 more than Alert (SNHU, 2019). Intel’s skills and resources will aid Featherfall Medical Center as a bigger company. The system is more expensive, but it will aid the medical facility in terms of governance, ethics, and compliance.
How the company could keep track of how the new health information system is being used.
Ad-hoc reporting is used by Intel to keep track of how its one-of-a-kind well-being data set-up is used (Durcevic, 2019). Ad-hoc reporting allows you to “address key business problems rapidly by providing an autonomous analysis, without the need to wait for standard analysis.” Ad hoc reports help administrators by emphasizing the organization’s expansion and long-term viability components. Intel also produces periodic reviews to monitor how the latest technique is being utilized.
How the company may invest its time most efficiently in deploying the new health information technology system.
Featherfall Medical Center can spend resources to building an advanced health information science set-up due to its locality (Durcevic, 2019). Featherfall may offer employees instruction on the latest technique to get them acquainted with how it operates. They prioritize observation of the success of the new platform and analyzing if any sound effects have resulted from the use of the technology. They may also consider how they may better its patients and the agency.
Reference
Durcevic, S. (2019, February 5). What is Ad Hoc Reporting and Analysis? Meaning, Benefits & Examples. Retrieved from https://www.datapine.com/blog/ad-hoc-reporting-analysismeaning-benefits-examples/ .
SNHU. (2019). HIM 500 Technology Information. Retrieved from http://snhumedia.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/him/him500/him500_technology_infor mation.pdf.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!