PSY Continuing Developments in Psychology Discussion Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
PSY Continuing Developments in Psychology Discussion Assignment
For each DQ elaborate within 260-300 words. Use in text citations accordingly. Use scholarly reference(s) along with the one(s) attached as well. Use and cite references using APA 7th Style Guide accordingly. Doctoral level class.
DQ 1) Consider the views of B. F. Skinner and Noam Chomsky on language acquisition and the “nature-nurture” debate of human language capacity. Which of these was more accurate? Why?
DQ 2) Imagine that an existential psychotherapist and a Freudian psychoanalyst encounter the same scenario where a person seeks help with recurring episodes of serious anxiety. Which of these therapists do you believe might most accurately attribute the cause or origin of the person’s anxiety? Why?
Reference:
Modern Clinical Neuropsychology in Historical Perspective Read: Meier, M. J. (1992). Modern clinical neuropsychology in historical perspective. The American Psychologist, 47(4), 550-558.
A History of Modern Psychology Read Chapter 15.
https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781305548916/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Cover
An Idealist’s View of Humanistic Psychotherapy Read: Palacios, A. F. (2018). An idealist’s view of humanistic psychotherapy. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 57(3), 223-231. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/johc.12084
3/2/22, 1:22 PM Diabetes: Lifestyle Programs for Type 2 | The Community Guide
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/diabetes-intensive-lifestyle-interventions-patients-type-2-diabetes 1/8
Systematic Review
Topic Diabetes, Obesity
Recommended (suf�cient evidence)
Audience Adults, Older Adults
Setting Clinical/Health Systems, Community
Strategy Counseling, Health Education
Diabetes Management: Intensive Lifestyle Interventions for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
October 2016
This webpage summarizes information available in the CPSTF Findings and Rationale Statement, located under the Snapshot tab.
The Community Guide (https://www.thecommunityguide.org)
Summary of CPSTF Finding
The Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) recommends intensive lifestyle interventions for
patients with type 2 diabetes to improve glycemic control and reduce risk factors for cardiovascular
disease.
Intervention
CPSTF Finding and Rationale Statement
Intensive lifestyle interventions provide ongoing counseling, coaching, or individualized guidance to
patients with type 2 diabetes to help them change their diet, level of physical activity, or both. Patients
must interact with program staff multiple times for a period of six months or longer.
Dietary components may include tailored advice, and physical activity components may include
structured and personalized guidance or supervised exercise training. Programs may have weight loss
goals or include additional components related to weight loss or maintenance.
The largest and longest trial to date provided intensive individual and group counseling and extended
interpersonal support for dietary changes, regular physical activity, and weight management.
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/topic/diabetes
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/topic/obesity
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/task-force/about-community-preventive-services-task-force
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/task-force/understanding-task-force-findings-and-recommendations
3/2/22, 1:22 PM Diabetes: Lifestyle Programs for Type 2 | The Community Guide
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/diabetes-intensive-lifestyle-interventions-patients-type-2-diabetes 2/8
Read the full CPSTF Finding and Rationale Statement [PDF – 793 KB] for details including implementation
issues, possible added benefits, potential harms, and evidence gaps.
Promotional Materials
Community Guide News
One Pager:
Users who viewed this also viewed
About The Systematic Review
Summary of Results
Intensive Lifestyle Interventions Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Among People with Type 2 Diabetes
Intensive Lifestyle Interventions for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Mental Health: Targeted School-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Programs to Reduce Depression and
Anxiety Symptoms
Violence Prevention: Primary Prevention Interventions to Reduce Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence
and Sexual Violence Among Youth
Diabetes Prevention: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers
The CPSTF uses recently published systematic reviews to conduct accelerated assessments of
interventions that could provide program planners and decision-makers with additional, effective
options. The following published review was selected and evaluated by a team of specialists in
systematic review methods, and in research, practice, and policy related to diabetes management
Huang XL, Pan JH, Chen D, Chen J, Hu TT. Efficacy of lifestyle interventions in patients with type 2
diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Internal Medicine 2016;27;37- 47.
The systematic review and meta-analysis included 17 studies (Huang et al., 2016; search period
through July 15, 2014). The CPSTF finding is based on results from a subset of 7 studies that evaluated
intensive physical activity programs (5 studies) and intensive dietary programs (3 studies) in addition
to expert input from team members and the CPSTF. The largest and longest study (Look AHEAD trial)
evaluated both intensive dietary and physical activity programs.
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/sites/default/files/assets/Diabetes-Lifestyle-Interventions.pdf
3/2/22, 1:22 PM Diabetes: Lifestyle Programs for Type 2 | The Community Guide
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/diabetes-intensive-lifestyle-interventions-patients-type-2-diabetes 3/8
Summary of Economic Evidence
Huang et al. did not consider evidence or information on the economic benefits of these interventions.
An economic evaluation of the Look AHEAD trial reported lower health-care costs over 10 years.
Applicability
Based on evidence from the review, the CPSTF finding is applicable to interventions offered to adults
with type 2 diabetes through healthcare settings in the United States.
Evidence Gaps
Detailed results from the systematic review are available in the CPSTF Finding and Rationale Statement [PDF –
793 KB].
The systematic review included 7 studies. The largest and longest study (Look AHEAD trial) evaluated
both intensive dietary and physical activity programs.
Dietary Programs (3 studies)
Intensive dietary programs led to favorable changes in reported outcomes.
Body Mass Index: non-significant decrease
Blood glucose (A1c): significant decrease
Systolic blood pressure: significant decrease
Diastolic blood pressure: significant decrease
LDL cholesterol: non-significant decrease
HDL cholesterol: significant increase
Physical Activity Programs (5 studies)
Intensive physical activity programs led to favorable changes in reported outcomes.
Body Mass Index: non-significant decrease
Blood glucose (A1c): significant decrease
Systolic blood pressure: non-significant decrease
Diastolic blood pressure: significant decrease
LDL cholesterol: non-significant decrease
HDL cholesterol: non-significant increase
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/sites/default/files/assets/Diabetes-Lifestyle-Interventions.pdf
3/2/22, 1:22 PM Diabetes: Lifestyle Programs for Type 2 | The Community Guide
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/diabetes-intensive-lifestyle-interventions-patients-type-2-diabetes 4/8
Study Characteristics
Analytic Framework
No content is available for this section.
Summary Evidence Table
A summary evidence table for this Community Guide review is not available because the CPSTF finding
is based on the following published systematic review:
The CPSTF identified several areas that have limited information. Additional research and evaluation
could help answer the following questions and fill remaining gaps in the evidence base. (What are
evidence gaps?)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!