PREA: Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
PREA: Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003
For PREA week I want you to pick 2 out of the 4 prompts and write a 2-4 page APA (Double spaced, sources cited, proper grammar, etc.) response to each prompt. This means that your total response should be no less than 4 pages and no more than 8 pages long (not including citations). No title page is necessary due to the nature of discussion boards. In the event that you write more than two prompts, the first two will be graded.
This assignment is worth 9pts.
10% – APA format
70% – Content
10% – Length
10% – Grammar and professionalism
At LEAST one source must be academic for each prompt, Google Scholar and UCF’s library are great places to find scholarly articles. There are no maximum number of references, but you need at least one source each.
Prompt 1: You are the warden of a small maximum security but low budget prison in any state that you wish. Describe the ways that you would reduce violence, particularly PREA related violence (Sexual violence and extortion) within prison walls. Tell me how you would achieve this goal with some level of specificity. What programs, infrastructure or other methods would you use to achieve PREA compliance and keep rates of PREA-recorded victimization to a minimum?Prompt 2: You are a warden of a large, short staffed prison in any state that you wish. One day you receive a grievance from an offender informing you that a correctional officer made an inappropriate comment towards an offender. You review the video tape and find that the correctional officer referred to the offender as a “punk bitch” and told the offender “Kiss my ass” after the offender raised his middle finger to officer. This is not the first grievance you have seen in regards to that officer making comments of that nature towards that offender and other offenders. How would you respond to this grievance? Officially, what is the best course of action to remain PREA compliant? Please remember that you are short staffed and justify whatever decision you make.
Prompt 3: You are an attorney for an inmate in any state that you wish and you are NOT a mandated reporter, nor do you have any legal obligation to report anything the offender says. Your client, a convicted child molester, tells you that they are at high risk of being sexually assaulted and that they have received threats from other offenders. What would you tell them that their options are? What actions would you recommend the offender take? What would be some of the consequences of these actions either official actions or from the “inmate code?”
Prompt 4: You are a correctional officer in a medium security facility in any state that you wish. An offender, who is a well known liar and a convicted sex offender tells you that they were just raped. They have no visible injuries and a smirk. You strongly suspect that this offender is gaming the system as they have been talking about wanting to be single-celled for a long time. What do you do? How did you come to this decision? Is your choice PREA compliant?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!