power of corporations undermine economic growth
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
power of corporations undermine economic growth
Thesis statement: The rising power of corporations undermine sustainable economic growth.
- Explore both dissenting and supportive elements of your initial position. Conduct searches of the local and international media and social media, collect data from government and non-governmental agencies (e.g., Statistics Canada, think tanks), consult academic journal articles and books, interview stakeholders, etc. (not all these methods need be used, but data must come from a variety of sources).
- The paper must take into account all evidence at hand, including (crucially) that which does not support the original position.
- Write a 2,500-to3,000-word reflective essay on how your initial position has changed and evolved as you pursued your research. Those who choose the research option must use predominantly their original research to support their claims, but they may also use a few readings from class.
- Ultimately, the reflective essay will either endorse, refute, or accept with qualifications the original position.
- The two critical elements will be to 1) explain how the research resulted in an evolution of the original position, and 2) relate your arguments to the readings done throughout the term.
- Include an annotated bibliography of the sources you consulted. This is simply a bibliography with a relatively short (6 -10sentences) explanation of the relevance of the source to the topic of your essay. Most importantly, should you choose to do the research option, your bibliographical entries must display precisely how you relate the reading to your topic; they may not simply be synopses of the texts.
Grading Criteria
- 20% Clarity of thought and expression. Are the ideas presented clearly? Are they well organized and connected to each other?
- 20% Depth and insight. Does the assignment represent meaningful and original thinking (as opposed to superficial and generic “thinking”)? Is it surprising? Does it connect ideas in unusual ways? Does it contain serious self-reflection?
- 30% Thoroughness of research. Is the topic framed appropriately (i.e. are most of the major issues involved covered)? Does it include compelling examples? Was the assignment pursued with energy and attention to detail? Did you invest yourself fully in the experience?
- 15% Use of course and supplementary material. Does the assignment incorporate ideas (even relevant quotes, where appropriate) from the Reading List and/or from class presentations, videos, and discussions, as well as supplementary materials? Be specific about the material you are using. I should not have to guess. In other words, referring to general themes addressed in the class is not enough.
- 15% Originality. Is the assignment conceived of and presented in an unusual or compelling way? Did you use the project as an opportunity to be innovative in your approach to challenging yourself and your ideas? Originality can be expressed simply by an unusual and provocative arrangement of ideas in a paper. In other words, it doesn’t have to be flashy to be creative. I will usually be more compelled by creativity of thought and mind linguistically represented than I will be by the accompanying design.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!