Plastic pollution harming marine wildlife
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Plastic pollution harming marine wildlife
Plastic pollution has become a major environmental problem, particularly in the world’s oceans. Marine wildlife is particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of plastic pollution, which can cause a range of negative impacts on their health and well-being.
One of the most significant impacts of plastic pollution on marine wildlife is ingestion. Plastic debris can be mistaken for food by marine animals, leading to the ingestion of plastics and other debris. This can result in serious health problems, such as digestive blockages, which can lead to starvation or suffocation. Ingested plastics can also release toxic chemicals, such as bisphenol A and phthalates, which can have negative impacts on the health of marine animals.
Entanglement in plastic debris is also a significant problem for marine wildlife. Discarded fishing gear, such as nets and lines, can entangle marine animals, leading to injury or death. Plastic bags and other debris can also entangle animals, such as sea turtles and seabirds, causing them to become trapped and unable to move or feed. Entanglement can cause injury, infection, or drowning, leading to a significant impact on the survival of affected species.
In addition to direct impacts, plastic pollution can also have indirect impacts on marine wildlife. The presence of plastic debris in the ocean can alter marine ecosystems, affecting the behavior and distribution of species. For example, some species may avoid areas of high plastic pollution, while others may be attracted to the same areas, leading to changes in species composition and diversity. Plastic pollution can also affect the availability and quality of food for marine animals, which can impact their health and well-being.
The problem of plastic pollution is widespread and affects all areas of the ocean. Plastics can travel long distances in the ocean, and even remote areas, such as the Arctic and Antarctic, are not immune to the impacts of plastic pollution. Plastic pollution also affects all levels of the food chain, from plankton to large marine mammals, and can have significant impacts on the health and survival of individual animals and entire ecosystems.
To address the problem of plastic pollution and protect marine wildlife, several strategies have been developed. These strategies include reducing plastic use and waste, improving waste management, and promoting education and outreach.
Reducing plastic use and waste is essential for addressing the problem of plastic pollution. Strategies such as using reusable bags and containers, avoiding single-use plastics, and purchasing products made from sustainable materials can all help to reduce plastic waste and prevent it from entering the ocean.
Improving waste management is also essential for addressing the problem of plastic pollution. Strategies such as improving recycling infrastructure, promoting responsible disposal of plastics, and implementing policies to reduce plastic waste can all help to reduce the amount of plastic entering the ocean.
Promoting education and outreach is also essential for addressing the problem of plastic pollution. Efforts such as public education campaigns, beach cleanups, and citizen science initiatives can all help to raise awareness about the impacts of plastic pollution and promote public support for conservation efforts.
In conclusion, plastic pollution is a significant threat to marine wildlife, causing a range of negative impacts on their health and well-being. To address the problem of plastic pollution and protect marine wildlife, it is essential to implement conservation strategies such as reducing plastic use and waste, improving waste management, and promoting education and outreach. By taking action to address the issue of plastic pollution, we can help to ensure the long-term survival of marine wildlife and promote the health and resilience of marine ecosystems worldwide.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Plastic pollution harming marine wildlife
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!