Northridge Jung Personality Test Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Northridge Jung Personality Test Paper
Next, please write an 2-3 page paper describing the results of your Jung Typology assessment and the information provided from Keirsey and upload it here. What did the assessment results say about you? (I am a single mother, work full time in a dermatology office as a medical assistant, I go to school full time, I love concerts and going out with friends, i love having family time with my daughter who plays soccer and is 17. I lost my parents and family to deaths at a young age. ) Do you agree or disagree? Why? Use examples. Finally, tell me how you can use the results to help you to reach your goals. I want to get my masters in health admin or become a P.A. physician assistant. Remember the paper must adhere to APA guidelines and that spelling and grammar count! See the rubric for more details about grading.
RESULTS:ESFJ
Extravert(25%) Sensing(16%) Feeling(12%) Judging(3%)
You have moderate preference of Extraversion over Introversion (25%)
You have slight preference of Sensing over Intuition (16%)
You have slight preference of Feeling over Thinking (12%)
You have marginal or no preference of Judging over Perceiving (3%)
ESFJ
Extraverted Sensing Feeling Judging
Guardians of birthdays, holidays and celebrations, ESFJs are generous entertainers. They enjoy and joyfully observe traditions and are liberal in giving, especially where custom prescribes.
All else being equal, ESFJs enjoy being in charge. They see problems clearly and delegate easily, work hard and play with zest. ESFJs, as do most SJs, bear strong allegiance to rights of seniority. They willingly provide service (which embodies life’s meaning) and expect the same from others.
ESFJs are easily wounded. And when wounded, their emotions will not be contained. They by nature “wear their hearts on their sleeves,” often exuding warmth and bonhomie, but not infrequently boiling over with the vexation of their souls. Some ESFJs channel these vibrant emotions into moving dramatic performances on stage and screen.
Strong, contradictory forces consume the ESFJ. Their sense of right and wrong wrestles with an overwhelming rescuing, ‘mothering’ drive. This sometimes results in swift, immediate action taken upon a transgressor, followed by stern reprimand; ultimately, however, the prodigal is wrested from the gallows of their folly, just as the noose tightens and all hope is lost, by the very executioner!
An ESFJ at odds with self is a remarkable sight. When a decision must be made, especially one involving the risk of conflict (abhorrent to ESFJs), there ensues an in-house wrestling match between the aforementioned black-and-white Values and the Nemesis of Discord. The contender pits self against self, once firmly deciding with the Right, then switching to Prudence to forestall hostilities, countered by unswerving Values, ad exhaustium, winner take all.
As caretakers, ESFJs sense danger all around–germs within, the elements without, unscrupulous malefactors, insidious character flaws. The world is a dangerous place, not to be trusted. Not that the ESFJ is paranoid; ‘hyper-vigilant’ would be more precise. And thus they serve excellently as protectors, outstanding in fields such as medical care and elementary education.
YOUR TYPE PREFERENCES
Extravert(25%) Sensing(16%) Feeling(12%) Judging(3%)
Because you appear to have marginal or no (3%) preference of Judging over Perceiving, characteristics of more than one personality type may apply to you:
ESFJ and ESFP.PORTRAIT OF THE GUARDIAN PROVIDER ESFJ
integrous
Providers seek to conduct themselves with integrity in all of their interactions with others. For these individuals integrity is about being moral, dependable, beneficent and respectable. They have a strong set of values with clear “should” and “shouldn’ts” which they expect others to abide by. Being integrous means that they are consistently applying the same rules of consideration across all of their relationships. They are naturally conscientious and orderly—and make for extremely loyal team players.
providing
Providers make it their aim in life to be a supplier of life necessities to those under their care.Their providing skills extend across the board from physical needs to social, emotional, and financial needs. These great nurturers appreciate being needed, and may spend much energy making sure that they deserve to be. They make outstanding hosts, able to remember people’s names, even after a single introduction. Providers are always concerned about the needs of their guests, wanting to insure that all are involved and cared for.
sociable
Providers are the most outgoing and most sociable of all; always expressing themselves to others in a friendly winsome manner. They are natural social contributors happily giving their time and energy to make sure that social functions are a success. These expressive individuals are personable and talkative, and may become restless when isolated from human interaction. With their pleasant outgoing personalities, Providers strike up conversations about any concrete topic with just about anyone.
caring
Providers are happiest when they express themselves in a personal manner as they give nurture. Their caring is most evident in the way they are continually checking up on others, to make sure that all is well. In serving others, they do so out of a genuine concern more than out of duty and responsibility. The recipients of this kind of care can sense a high degree of warmth and sincerity from them. Providers are fiercely devoted to their loved ones, and they are usually fond hearted and sentimental.
procedural
Providers prefer to take a step-by-step approach where tasks are completed precisely as a part of a process. They rely heavily on the past, going with the tried and true rather than inventing new ways of doing things. They also believe that the future is uncertain and can often have a pessimistic outlook. This perspective makes them carry out their duties with a great deal of caution. Providers seek for a structured environment where there is little fuss, and schedules are set and plans are correctly executed.
collaborating
Providers yearn for belonging and therefore enjoy making others feel as though they are an important part of the group. They have an inclusive attitude and like to work together to get the job done. When they belong to a team they look for players who will add value. They seek out potential members who are diligent, responsible, and cooperative. They believe that collaborating is about everyone marching together flawlessly to achieve success.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!