Lung cancer screening for individuals at high risk
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Lung cancer screening for individuals at high risk
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and early detection is crucial for successful treatment. One way to detect lung cancer is through screening, which can be especially beneficial for individuals at high risk. In this blog post, we will discuss lung cancer screening, who is considered at high risk, and the potential benefits and risks of the test.
Lung cancer screening is a process that uses imaging tests such as low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to detect lung cancer in its early stages. LDCT uses a low dose of radiation to produce detailed images of the lungs, which can detect small lung nodules that may be indicative of lung cancer.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends lung cancer screening for individuals who are at high risk of the disease. High-risk individuals include current and former smokers between the ages of 55 and 80 who have smoked the equivalent of a pack a day for 30 years or more. Individuals who have quit smoking within the past 15 years may also be considered for screening, as the risk of lung cancer decreases but does not disappear completely after quitting.
The potential benefits of lung cancer screening are significant. Early detection of lung cancer can improve the chances of survival and reduce the need for aggressive treatment. Studies have shown that lung cancer screening can reduce the risk of death from lung cancer by 20-30%. Additionally, screening can also detect other lung abnormalities such as emphysema, which can also be treated.
However, like any medical test, lung cancer screening also has potential downsides. One of the main risks of lung cancer screening is that it can lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of lung cancer. Many lung nodules detected on LDCT may be benign, and further testing such as biopsy may be unnecessary. Additionally, screening can also lead to false-positive results, causing unnecessary anxiety and further testing.
It’s important to note that lung cancer screening is not recommended for individuals who do not meet the criteria for high risk, such as those who have never smoked. Additionally, screening is not recommended for individuals who are not able to undergo treatment if cancer is detected. Individuals who are considering lung cancer screening should discuss the potential benefits and risks of the test with their healthcare provider.
In addition to screening, individuals at high risk of lung cancer can also take steps to reduce their risk of the disease. Quitting smoking is the most effective way to reduce the risk of lung cancer, and individuals who quit smoking at any age can see a reduction in their risk. Maintaining a healthy diet and regular physical activity, as well as avoiding exposure to environmental toxins, can also help to reduce the risk of lung cancer.
In conclusion, lung cancer screening is an effective tool for detecting the disease early, especially in individuals at high risk. The USPSTF recommends screening for current and former smokers between the ages of 55 and 80 who have smoked the equivalent of a pack a day for 30 years or more. However, it’s important to weigh the potential benefits and risks of the test with your healthcare provider, and to consider other ways to reduce the risk of lung cancer such as quitting smoking and leading a healthy lifestyle.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Lung cancer screening for individuals at high risk
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!