Left Hand/Right Hand Activity Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
You’ve probably heard the expression, “the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.” This exercise is somewhat like this, in that, perhaps, one part of the brain does not recognize what another part of the brain is doing. In both cases, integration is helpful, wouldn’t you say?
Mental models are the images, assumptions, ideas, and stories we carry around in our heads. In this assignment, the idea is to turn your mental mirror inward so you can have a look at your internal pictures and thoughts and bring them to the surface where you can see them.
The purpose of this exercise is to become more aware of how you communicate in moments of conflict while exploring how the position you take in this conflict might be related to your actual interests. (You will learn more about positions and interests in a later module.) In order to achieve the maximum learning, follow the steps exactly as they are laid out. Include your chart and the noted paragraph describing the conflict (from Part A), and the part B analysis.
Part A – Describing the Conflict
- Choose a problem to write about. This should be a difficult or challenging interpersonal situation you’ve been involved in the recent past, say the last two or three months. Write a brief paragraph describing the situation at the top of the page. You can also create a chart on a computer if you prefer. Some examples might be:
- You can’t reach agreement with a friend or colleague on an important issue
- You believe you have been treated unfairly
- You believe that you (or your ideas) are being ignored
If you can’t think of a conflict which matches the criteria, then choose a less recent one, or imagine one you might have had.
- Divide the rest of the page into two columns to create a table.
- Label the right-hand column “What I Said.” Recall the frustrating or annoying conversations you had about this conflict. Write down the dialogue (i.e., what was said) in as much detail as you can remember, in this column.
- Label the left-hand column “What I Was Thinking and Feeling.” In the left-hand column, write down what you were thinking and feeling at the time, but did not
- Reflect on what you have written. What were the differences? Writing your answers to questions 6 to 13 will help you figure this out.
Part B – The Analysis
Begin by writing a brief paragraph or inserting a chart of the conflict situation, as described in Part A above. Then reflect thoughtfully on the following questions:
- (5 marks) What led me to think and feel the way I did before and during the conflict?
- (5 marks) What was my intention? What was I trying to accomplish? Did I get the results I intended?
- (5 marks) Did my comments contribute to the difficulties? How?
- (5 marks) What assumptions did I make about the other person or people?
- (5 marks) What were the costs, if any, of operating this way? The payoffs?
- (5 marks) What prevented me from acting differently?
- (20 marks) How could I rewrite this conversation if I were to have it now? Address the following specifically:
- How could my right-hand column bring some of my important left-hand column thinking to the surface?
- What could I have said that would effectively help the other person reveal theirleft-hand column?
- How did I say what I said? Did my tone of voice or body language affect how my message was heard?
- How did the other person hear me? What, if anything, could I have done to make sure my message was clearly heard?
- (20 marks) Summary Reflection: What have I learned from this assignment?
Submit your answers to Part B (questions 1 through 8) together with a summary of experience and learning achieved through this assignment in the drop box.
The summary must be a minimum 250 words.
You can use this tool in the future for resolving any kind of interpersonal conflict, at work or at home. If you are working with others, coaching or parenting, or even in terms of a conversation with a friend that went bad, try it out.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!