CJP 2288 Case Study Scenarios Questions
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Instructions
For this assignment, select one (1) of the three (3) scenarios. Then, using the Criminal Code of Canada and case law, identify the Sections that grant you the authority to search and/or seize based on the details outlined in each specific scenario. Make sure to use Martin’s criminal code 2020 (Canadian criminal codes)
NOTE: this assignment focuses on the information covered in Module 3, so keep your focus here and especially on section 489 CC.
See below for further direction on this assignment.
Scenario 1 – Search with a Search Warrant
You have entered a residence via a Section 487 Search Warrant to search for stolen property. Your judicial authorization allows you to search for specific stereo equipment, flat screen TVs with remotes, and various power tools like drills, saws, etc. After entering the premises via the search warrant, you start your search and shortly thereafter, inadvertently, find a small bag containing a white powder that you believe to be powder cocaine.
- Can you seize the bag of what you believe to be powder cocaine?
- If so, quote the Section(s) of the Criminal Codethat allows you to do this? Be specific.
- Provide case law examples (at least two) that agree with your point of view and provide a summary of your case law and how/why it agrees with your point of view.
- Articulate your thought process in short essay format and account for the sources where you located your information.
Scenario 2 – Traffic Stop
You are on patrol and stop a vehicle with two people in same (driver/passenger), just north of Skylark, Alberta. Based on confidential informant information provided to you earlier in the evening, you believe they are in possession of a controlled substance, at least one ounce of crack cocaine. From the driver’s door, you notice a white powdery residue, as well as a ‘crack pipe’ in the console of the vehicle. You further smell a strange odour and the driver and passenger have conflicting stories as to the evening’s events. Although you have limited experience in policing, you have been to college and have been around crack cocaine use and you are familiar with what it looks like and how it is consumed. Based on what your CI told you, combined with your observations, you believe you have reasonable grounds to arrest both the driver and the passenger for possession of a controlled substance and do so.
- Can you search both the driver and passenger incident to arrest?
- If so, why? Quote the Section(s) of the Criminal Codethat allows you to do this? Be specific.
- Provide case law examples (at least two) that agree with your point of view and provide a summary of your case law and how/why it agrees with your point of view.
- Can you search the vehicle and immediate area around the vehicle for evidence?
- If so, why? Quote what section(s) of the Criminal Codeallows you to do this? Be specific.
- Provide case law examples (at least two) that agree with your point of view and provide a summary of your case law and how/why it agrees with your point of view.
- Articulate your thought process in short essay format and account for the sources where you located your information.
Scenario 3 – Seizure without a Search Warrant
You have been seconded due to manpower shortages to assist the Skylark PS Major Crimes Unit with an ongoing homicide. The Primary Investigator has briefed you on the investigation to date and you have now been partnered with a more seasoned officer. During the briefing that the Primary Investigator provided you, he made a point of emphasizing that should you and your partner come across a pair of size 12, red, white and black Air Jordan high top basketball shoes on any of the three main suspects, that you are to seize them. The Primary Investigator further explains that the reason for this is that the Skylark PS Forensic Identification Section obtained a very good shoe print from the crime scene. Through a shoe print database, they have narrowed the shoe print down to the previously mentioned Air Jordan’s. Skylark PS FIS believe that a match may be afforded if these shoes are lawfully seized. Later in the investigation, you and your partner are tasked with arresting one of the three main suspects on an unrelated outstanding warrant for being unlawfully at large. After arresting the suspect and booking him into cells, the suspect is searched, and upon removing his footwear, you realize that the shoes the suspect has just taken off and are a perfect match to what the Primary Investigator provided to you. Based on the information provided in this scenario answer the following questions.
- Can you lawfully seize the Nike basketball shoes?
- If so, why? Quote the Section(s) of the Criminal Codethat allows you to do this? Be specific.
- Provide case law examples (at least two) that agree with your point of view and provide a summary of your case law and how/why it agrees with your point of view.
- Articulate your thought process in short essay format and account for the sources where you located your information.
Response Requirements
- Your response needs to be in APA format, which in brief includes cover page, reference page, double spaced, indented paragraphs, in text citations, etc. (If you do not know APA it is your responsibilityto learn it. There are resources attached to this course that can assist you, plus the Buchanan Library has personnel that can further provide assistance.)
- Answer the questions in a short essay that should be at least three paragraphs in length.
- Writing should be articulate, clear, and concise with a logical flow.
- Rationales should be thorough and include all requirements described in the scenario requirements.
- You must supply two case law examples that support your answer and you must supply summaries of each case law.
- Use proper spelling and grammar.
Submit your response in a Word document to your instructor in the drop box. Use the rubric below as a guide for completing this assignment.
Rubric
CJP 2288 Case Study Scenarios
CJP 2288 Case Study Scenarios Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Questions: Major question(s) posed in the scenario has been clearly answered.
4.0 pts Fully, thoroughly and accurately completed all requirements and expectations.
3.0 pts Mostly completed all requirements and expectations. Mostly thorough and accurate.
2.0 pts Completed some requirements and expectations. Somewhat thorough and accurate.
1.0 pts Completed few requirements and expectations. Neither thorough nor accurate.
0.0 pts No Marks
4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriminal code: The correct section(s) of the criminal code have been specifically quoted, including title and number.
4.0 pts Fully, thoroughly and accurately completed all requirements and expectations.
3.0 pts Mostly completed all requirements and expectations. Mostly thorough and accurate.
2.0 pts Completed some requirements and expectations. Somewhat thorough and accurate.
1.0 pts Completed few requirements and expectations. Neither thorough nor accurate.
0.0 pts No Marks
4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase law: At least two case law examples have been provided that clearly agree with point of view. Examples are supportive without question and a summary of each are provided.
4.0 pts Fully, thoroughly and accurately completed all requirements and expectations.
3.0 pts Mostly completed all requirements and expectations. Mostly thorough and accurate.
2.0 pts Completed some requirements and expectations. Somewhat thorough and accurate.
1.0 pts Completed few requirements and expectations. Neither thorough nor accurate.
0.0 pts No Marks
4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticulation and clarity: Essay is at least 3 paragraphs in length. Writing is articulate, clear and concise, has logical flow, and is easy to read.
4.0 pts Fully, thoroughly and accurately completed all requirements and expectations.
3.0 pts Mostly completed all requirements and expectations. Mostly thorough and accurate.
2.0 pts Completed some requirements and expectations. Somewhat thorough and accurate.
1.0 pts Completed few requirements and expectations. Neither thorough nor accurate.
0.0 pts No Marks
4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling/grammar & APA Format Followed: Uses correct spelling and grammar without error. Submission follows APA format, including cover and reference pages, double spaced, 12 point font, indented paragraphs, etc.
4.0 pts Fully, thoroughly and accurately completed all requirements and expectations.
3.0 pts Mostly completed all requirements and expectations. Mostly thorough and accurate.
2.0 pts Completed some requirements and expectations. Somewhat thorough and accurate.
1.0 pts Completed few requirements and expectations. Neither thorough nor accurate.
0.0 pts No Marks
4.0 pts Total Points: 20.0
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!