Human-wildlife conflict impacting animal survival
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Human-wildlife conflict impacting animal survival
Human-wildlife conflict is a growing concern globally, and it poses a significant threat to the survival of several species. Human-wildlife conflict refers to the negative interactions that occur between humans and wild animals when their habitats overlap. This conflict can take several forms, such as crop-raiding, livestock predation, property damage, and human injury or death.
The impacts of human-wildlife conflict can be severe, particularly for endangered or threatened species. When conflicts occur, humans often resort to retaliatory measures, such as hunting or poisoning, to protect their livelihoods and property. This can result in the death or injury of individual animals, and in some cases, entire populations.
One of the significant impacts of human-wildlife conflict is the loss of habitat for wild animals. As human populations expand and encroach on wildlife habitats, the natural resources that animals rely on for survival, such as food and water, become increasingly scarce. This forces animals to venture further into human-dominated landscapes in search of resources, leading to increased conflict.
Another impact of human-wildlife conflict is the loss of livestock and crops, which can have severe economic consequences for farmers and communities. When wild animals raid crops or attack livestock, farmers may experience significant financial losses, leading to retaliatory measures and an escalation of conflict.
Human-wildlife conflict can also have significant impacts on human safety, particularly in areas where large predators, such as lions and tigers, are present. When humans and wildlife come into close proximity, there is an increased risk of injury or death from animal attacks. This can lead to fear and anxiety among local communities, further exacerbating conflict.
To address the problem of human-wildlife conflict, several strategies can be implemented. One of the most effective strategies is to improve habitat connectivity and reduce fragmentation by establishing wildlife corridors and protected areas. This can help to maintain and restore natural habitats, reducing the likelihood of human-wildlife conflict.
Another strategy is to promote sustainable land-use practices that minimize the impact of human activities on wildlife habitats. This can include measures such as promoting sustainable agriculture practices, reducing deforestation and forest degradation, and managing water resources to support both human and wildlife populations.
Education and awareness campaigns can also be effective in reducing human-wildlife conflict. By raising awareness of the importance of wildlife and the potential consequences of conflict, individuals and communities can take proactive steps to prevent conflict from occurring. This can include measures such as securing livestock enclosures, using non-lethal deterrents to keep wildlife away from crops, and taking steps to reduce the attraction of food sources for wild animals.
Finally, there is a need for effective conflict resolution mechanisms that address the needs of both humans and wildlife. This can include measures such as compensating farmers for losses due to wildlife raids, providing incentives for the adoption of sustainable land-use practices, and implementing early warning systems to alert communities of potential conflict.
In conclusion, human-wildlife conflict poses a significant threat to the survival of several species. The impacts of conflict can be severe, including the loss of habitat, economic losses, and the risk of injury or death to humans and animals. By implementing effective strategies to address the root causes of conflict and promote coexistence between humans and wildlife, we can help to ensure the survival of endangered and threatened species and protect the natural world for future generations.
Human-wildlife conflict impacting animal survival
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Human-wildlife conflict impacting animal survival
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!