HSM 735 Project of Your Choice In an Industry of Your Choice
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Semester Project – HSM 735 SEL
Assume you have been hired as a Project Leader/Manager for a Corporation and have been given a project to manage. Your goal is to complete the project in a way to fulfill the goals of the internal and external stakeholders of the project, including your project sponsors, facility executives, patients, government entities and the like.
Choose your own project: select a project that meets your interests and inspirations, but must be one that requires improvement and management skills. Examples:
- A hospital has a high rate of re-admission. Your project is to lower the rate by 30% in a year;
- A company needs to digitize all its purchase order data;
- And so on …
The final semester project will include a paper about a – Project of your choice, in an industry of your choice – you will use the knowledge gained from chapters 1-10 of the text book and other course material, to act as the proxy project manager to develop a comprehensive project management plan. The content of the paper is mainly based on the theoretical aspects of project management.
Your paper should follow the APA format (double-spaced) with separate cover and reference.
The cover page should contain the following centralized information:
Title of the project paper:
Your name:
Course code and title:
Professor’s Name:
Program Name:
College Name
Some of the topics you could use in your paper (your choice):
- Your project Attributes
- Your project Constraints (scope, cost, schedule)
- Your project management process groups
- Stakeholder registry and analysis – who are they? Why did you choose them?
- Team Members (can use made up names, but specify how many people in your teams and the roles they have to play)
- SWOT analysis
- Mind mapping
- Financial Projection (NPV and ROI
- Project Rick Map
- Your chosen project management methodology
- Pre-initiating meeting
- Project charter
- Scope statement
- Team contract
- WBS (graphical/ tabular)
- Activity List
- Milestone list
- Network diagrams (AOA, AON, Gantt chart)
- Resources
- Time management and buffers
- Gantt time Schedule
- Cost Estimating Techniques and baseline
- Your Quality management plan
- Quality Metrics dashboard
- Procurement and Supplier contract
- Communication plan
- Rick management
- Make or buy analysis
- Integration Management in Execution
- Deliverables
- Work performance data and change requests
- Conflict management
- Assess team performance
- Quality assurance techniques
- Human Resources management
- Forecasting with Earned Value Management
- Validating scope
- Time, cost and quality control Management
- Closing Projects
- Customer Acceptance and Project Completion Reports
- Lessons learned
- Close-out Meeting and Knowledge Transfer
Please keep in mind that the semester project should reflect the new knowledge that you have gained in this course and your additional readings, particularly the tools and guidelines included in the text book. Your paper will present an analytical and measured solution to a problem. You are advised to use charts, graphs and schematic display of your work.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!