Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
HIEU 202 Discussion Board Project
Purpose:
- The purpose of this assignment is to foster communication and discussion among the class regarding specific topics.
Requirements: Thread
- You will post a 200–250-word thread in the Discussion Board Forum answering the assigned question(s). Be sure to stay within the word limit. Remember that this is a discussion, not an essay or paper. Leave room for others to comment, challenge, and question you.
- The thread should show careful analysis and offer a clear argument. Support your argument with specific details from the assigned reading, textbook and/or lectures.
- Write in your own words. If you do quote, keep quoted material to a minimum and be sure to cite your source.
- Clearly introduce evidence taken from other sources so that the reader knows where the information originated (e.g., According to the lecture…).
Requirements: Participation (Replies)
- Check the Discussion Board Forum regularly while it is open.
- Post a minimum of 2 replies to 2 different classmates, responding to their thread and engaging them in a conversation (see below for tips). The 2 replies must be 100–150 words each.
- Remember to be courteous and use appropriate language. While it is acceptable to commend another student’s post, your replies should go further and engage the actual content of the post.
- Take the time to respond to comments posted to your thread, especially questions and challenges.
- The best participation happens over a period of days. It is better not to post all your replies on the same day. Likewise, if you wait until the last minute to post your replies, you limit the possibility for interaction. Participate in the discussion several times, spacing out your responses, commenting on several threads, responding to questions on your own thread, and engaging others in a dialogue on the topic.
- Note that the best discussion posts are those that encourage participation and further dialogue on the topic.
Grading:
- Meeting the minimum requirements will only result in minimum grades. Grades will be assigned based on the quality of your participation in the discussion, the extent of dialogue, the number of posts, and the level of analysis present in your argument. See the grading rubric for additional details.
Tips for Participation:
- “I like what you said,” “That’s a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment,” can be a beginning, but these are not sufficient for real dialogue and interaction.
- Avoid purely “grading comments”—such as “your writing style is very clear,” or “I like how you explained XYZ.” While encouraging comments can and should be included, you need to also include substance.
- Encourage dialogue with others by explaining why you agree/disagree with their argument. Challenge opinions and arguments in a professional, polite manner, and try to use open-ended questions.
- Offer additional support for an argument that you agree with, and make sure that your challenges also include support.
- Write posts that demonstrate thoughtful, critical engagement of the material.
Remember, the purpose of this assignment is not to create another essay, or to encourage monologues; the purpose is to engage in critical thinking and serious discussion. This can only be done when you take the time to engage classmates; respond to their threads and comments on your thread; ask and answer questions.
Your thread is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned module/week.
Your replies are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same module/week.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!