Handling Tough Decisions in the Workplace
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Handling Tough Decisions in the Workplace
Discussion: Handling Tough Decisions in the Workplace
Managers make numerous decisions on a daily basis. For some, the best choice is easy or straightforward to determine. If a machine breaks down, you either need to repair it or replace it. In an increasingly interconnected and complex world, however, the best decisions can often be unclear. Consider where you would stand on the following scenario:
A company has developed a new product for which there is a great demand. The consensus of the leadership team is that the company should capitalize on this opportunity and hike up the price to generate a 300% return on each sale. They feel that, as long as the marketplace is willing to pay for it, then there is no problem, especially since this would help solve recent discussions of layoffs due to declining sales. Only one person in the leadership team voices disapproval of this approach, saying that this is a greedy action that would rip off customers and go against the company’s values. The person feels that—despite what it would mean for the business—the product should be priced to generate a 40% return, which is an average return for the company’s products.
Assignment:
Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ posts “See below” in one or more of the following ways:
- Relate your own experiences to those of your colleague, including similar or different approaches you took to address your own situation and your reasoning for your decision.
- Provide an alternative viewpoint on your colleague’s situation or on how your colleague might approach the situation in the future. Include a rationale to support your response.
- 3 – 4 paragraphs
- No plagiarism
- APA citing
1st Colleague – Natasha Mills
Natasha Mills
Handling Tough Decisions in the Workplace
Top of Form
Whereas society in general and individual organizations have ethical codes that guide the behaviors and actions of people within these contexts, the concept of ethics still largely depends on one’s personal values and moral principles. When individuals lack these, their behavior is always subject to manipulation, and they may easily compromise their ethical beliefs in different situations. one of the psychological dynamics that precede the crossing of ethical lines is justified neglect. “When people don’t speak up about ethical breaches because they are thinking of more immediate rewards such as staying on a good footing with the powerful” (Wedell-Wedellsborg, 2019). Justified neglect is the most predominant psychological dynamic, followed by cultural numbness and omnipotence when it comes to crossing ethical lines.
The ethical situation that I have experienced involved the psychological dynamic of justified neglect. I was part of a panel tasked with hiring a candidate that would fill a certain position that had been left by an employee who had just retired. After conducting interviews, my colleagues in the hiring panel and I had identified a candidate that was a perfect fit for the position. Not only was the candidate the best in the interviews, but he also had good work experience, a glowing resume, and innovative ideas that would positively impact the organization, particularly since he had worked for a competitor. However, the candidate’s salary demands were higher than that which the organization was offering its employees in the same cadre. The candidate refused to accept anything less than what he was demanding, which made the hiring process complex.
On the one hand, the candidate was good for the organization and there was no doubt that he would bring new perspectives that would enhance the competitive advantage of the company. Thus, hiring him was unquestionable. On the other hand, hiring the candidate translated to the company’s acceptance of his salary demands. This, however, required the company to increase the salaries of employees in the same cadre, which it was not ready to do. The result was an ethical dilemma that involved deciding between hiring the candidate and keeping his salary a secret from the other employees, or leaving out the candidate and doing right by the other employees.
Ethical situations are always challenging no matter how much you prepare for them. “Even if you’ve planned for an ethical career and established safeguards, it can be difficult to face moral challenges in the moment” (Kouchaki & Smith, 2020, p.5). The situation was challenging and prompted the panel to agree to hiring the candidate and keeping his salary a secret. However, I strongly disapproved their decision. I was relying on my core principles and values of fairness, integrity, and equity during the situation, which I told them openly. In addition, I outlined to them the potential repercussions of the decision if any of the employees found out about the secret. This led them to ponder on the situation instead of opting for the easy way out that was unethical. In the end, they decided to hire the second-best candidate who accepted the salary that the organization was offering.
Looking back, I would have made the same decision if the situation happened again. Nei & Nei (2018) talk about balancing analysis plus action, which involves keeping in mind the context and possible impact of a decision. My ability to analyze the situation helped me to outline the potential impacts of either decisions to the rest of the panel, causing them to make the right choice. This balance of analysis and action also confirms the concept of the power of one. Eyrich et al. (2019) posit that an individual with the willingness to speak and a clarity of conscience has the power to make a difference. In the situation described above, the rest of the panel hastily made the decision to hire the candidate while ignoring its possible subsequent implications. However, by disagreeing with them, as well as my willingness to let them know of that fact, I convinced them to make the right decision, thereby proving the power of one.
Eyrich, N. W., Quinn, R. E., & Fessell, D. P. (2019, December 27). How one person can change the conscience of an organization. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/12/how-one-person-can-change-the-conscience-of-an-organization
Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2020). Building an ethical career a three-stage approach to navigating moral challenges at work. Harvard business review, 2020(January-February), 1-6.
Nei, K., & Nei, D. (2018, September 10). Don’t try to be the “Fun boss” — and other lessons in ethical leadership. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/09/dont-try-to-be-the-fun-boss-and-other-lessons-in-ethical-leadership
Wedell-Wedellsborg, M. (2019). The psychology behind unethical behavior. Harvard Business Review.
Bottom of Form
2nd Colleague – Sandra Patterson
Sandra Patterson
RE: Discussion – Week 8Bottom of Form
Handling tough decisions in the workplace
When I worked in a residential facility a few years ago, there was a tough decision involving working overnight on a part-time because they were short-staffed. There were understaffing, underpay, and over-work issues for the overnight shift. My options were to work overnight temporarily, replace an overnight shift worker, or switch my morning shift to overnight. After all, the residents were sleeping at the time. What almost appealed to me was that since there was less to do after changing them and writing their reports, I could even do homework while they were sleeping. At the time, I was still finishing my bachelor’s degree. My child was still finishing high school. I did not want to be unavailable during that vulnerable part of his life in the evening. I also always sleep early. That shift would not have been convenient for me at all.
The guidelines, rules, and values of the facility influenced my decision. First, I knew that the residential facility had guidelines for all workers that gave them the option to accept or refuse to do the overnight shift. I also knew that the residential facility had rules that could either reduce the overnight hours or ask workers from other facilities to come and assist. I knew that the residential facility respected the workers’ values for their preference for working hours (Seidman, 2017). As a single Mom, I did not feel comfortable with the overnight shift. My son was going to be unattended at home. I felt vulnerable working overnight with single male colleagues. Based on those facts, I politely contacted the manager on site who had posted the offer. They told me to go to the office in person. Or I could go to the office with a written note explaining my reasons. I sent an explanation to the manager early enough. I wanted them to have enough time to choose other workers for the overnight shift. Then I followed through to make sure they received my note. I was able to bypass working overnight that way.
I would still approach the situation the same way if it happened again. That is why it is necessary to be humble to build trust with my team. By building trust with my team early before the circumstance occurred, I was able to gain their respect when I voiced my opinion about the overnight shift. Many of my colleagues even said that they knew that I slept early. They knew that the overnight shift would not be comfortable for me. I need to be steady and dependable. It will show my team that I am suited for the morning shift. I did show that I was willing to work until the early evening hours on a few occasions when they needed help with the second shift. I also need to be reliable, rule-following, and responsible. My dependable, rule-following, and organized character traits prompted me to follow through by sending a note to the manager (Kuligowski, 2020). I explained my non-availability for overnights. I did emphasize that I was available for occasional shifts in the second shift because it ended early in the evening. It was evident to them that I exercised caution. They also saw that I could take calculated risks. In addition, I showed that I could adhere to organizational principles. I gained their trust. Finally, modesty is always the best option to choose. Professionalism is necessary when at work. I should remember to balance analysis with action. I need to be vigilant. My interactions have an impact on others (Nei, 2018).
References:
Kuligowski, K. (2020) How to be an ethical leader: 7 tips for success. Business News Daily. Retrieved from https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/5537-how-to-be
Nei, K. (2018) Don’t try to be the “fun boss “ – and other lessons in ethical leadership. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, pp. 2-4. Retrieved from http://hbr.org
Seidman, D. (2017) The four pillars of moral leadership. Fortune, 176(4), pp. 90-92.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!