Final Research Paper Assignment for HHS310
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Final Research Paper Assignment for HHS310
Create an outline for the framework for the topic chosen for your Final Research Document in a one- to two-page paper (excluding title and reference pages). In addition to the foregoing, the outline should show how your theory option satisfies the genetic, societal, and individual aspects that contribute to total personality:
The origins and principles of the theory
Validity and utility of the theory are assessed.
How the theorist’s culture, race, gender, and social status may have influenced him or her
An explanation of why you believe this theory is the best fit for your approach to assisting others.
In addition to the course textbook, use at least two scholarly sources that were published within the previous ten years and are formatted according to APA style as described in the Writing Center.
Examine the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the assignment.HHS310.W3.A1.04.2018
Description:
10.00 is the maximum possible score.
Produces a Sketch Containing the Framework for the Final Paper’s Selected Topic Total: 2.00
Exceptional – Creates a well-organized outline for the Final Paper’s framework.
Proficient – Creates an outline for the framework for the Final Paper, but it is little underdeveloped and lacks order.
Basic – Creates an outline for the framework for the Final Paper, but it is weak and lacks overall order.
Below Expectations – Attempts to build an outline for the framework for the Final Paper; however, the outline is severely underdeveloped and lacks basic organization.
Non-Performance – The outline for the Final Paper’s framework is either missing or does not include the components listed in the assignment instructions.
Describes how theory selection satisfies the genetic, social, and individual factors that contribute to whole personality.
2.00 totalExceptional – Describes in detail how the chosen theory satisfies all three criteria.
Proficient – Explains how the chosen theory satisfies all three criteria. There are few minor details missing.
Basic – Explains in part how the chosen theory satisfies at least two defined criteria. Relevant information is missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how the chosen theory meets at least two indicated criteria, but important details are absent.
Non-Performance – The description of how the chosen theory satisfies the genetic, societal, and individual aspects that combine to generate the overall personality is either missing or incomplete, as indicated in the assignment requirements.
Describes the theory’s origins and principles, as well as how the theorist’s culture, ethnicity, gender, and social status may have influenced the theory’s validity and utility.
2.00 totalDistinguished – Effectively and thoroughly describes the theory’s concepts, validity and utility assessments, and how the theorist’s culture, ethnicity, gender, and social standing may have influenced him or her.
Proficient – Effectively describes the theory’s concepts, validity and value assessments, and how culture, ethnicity, gender, and social standing may have impacted the theorist. There are few minor details missing.
Basic – Describes the theory’s premises, validity and utility assessments, and how culture, ethnicity, gender, and social standing may have impacted the theorist. Relevant information is missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to define the theory’s principles, validity and utility assessments, and how the theorist’s culture, ethnicity, gender, and social standing may have influenced the theorist; nevertheless, the description is imprecise and/or substantial details are absent.
Non-Performance – The description of the theory’s origins and principles, the assessment of the theory’s validity and utility, and how the theorist’s culture, ethnicity, gender, and social status may have influenced the theorist are either absent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains Why This Theory Is the Most Effective for a Personal Approach to the Helping Profession.
2.00 totalExceptional – Clearly illustrates why this idea is best for a personal approach to the helping profession.
Proficient – Describes why this idea is most effective when applied to a personal approach to the helping profession. The explanation is a little rudimentary.
Basic – Explains why this philosophy is best for a personal approach to aiding professions. The explanation is incomplete.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain why this idea works best for a personal approach to helping; nevertheless, the explanation is severely lacking.
Non-Performance – The explanation of why the theory works best for a personal approach to the helping profession is either missing or does not include the components listed in the assignment requirements.
Total: 0.60 Written Communication: Context and Purpose of Writing
Exceptional – Demonstrates a rigorous approach to information structure and presentation. The goal of the text is obvious and simple to comprehend. In the sentences and paragraphs, summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally. The paper is easy to work with.
Proficient – Demonstrates a thorough understanding of content arrangement and presentation. The writing’s goal is, for the most part, obvious and simple to comprehend. The merging of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes causes various issues. The paper has a nice flow to it.
Basic – Shows only a rudimentary understanding of content structure and presentation in written work. Although the aim of the writing is clear, it may not be interwoven throughout the task. The merging of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes has a number of flaws. In certain places, the paper does not flow well.
Below Expectations – Content organization and presentation are severely lacking. The writing’s objective isn’t evident. There isn’t much mixing of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. When reading, the paper does not flow smoothly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements specified in the instructions.
Content Development for Written Communication
0.60 totalDistinguished – Discovers and develops profound ideas within the context of the discipline, developing the work as a whole, using suitable, pertinent, and convincing content.
Proficient -Uses appropriate and relevant content to uncover ideas within the discipline’s context, thereby molding the whole output.
Basic – Makes use of relevant and appropriate content, but does not apply it to the discovery or development of ideas. In general, content aids in the shaping of written work.
Below Expectations – Makes use of content, even if it is unconnected or irrelevant to the issue. Content does not add to the growth of the written work and may divert the reader’s attention away from it.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements specified in the instructions.
Controlling Syntax and Mechanics in Written Communication
0.20 totalExceptional – Demonstrates a thorough understanding and arrangement of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. There are no faults in the written work, and it is quite straightforward to understand.
Proficient – Demonstrates a thorough understanding and arrangement of syntax and mechanics like as spelling and grammar. There are no faults in the written work, and it is quite straightforward to understand.
Basic – Demonstrates a basic understanding of syntax and mechanics like spelling and grammar. There are a few flaws in the written work that may cause the reader to become distracted.
Below Expectations – Fails to demonstrate basic syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. The reader gets distracted by glaring errors in the written content.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements specified in the instructions.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!