Ethical Behavior Diversity Civil Discourse and Educating Adults
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Paper Organization
Start with a title page and organize your paper with the following guidelines: 5-7 pages
- Title Page:Include a title page with the following title: Ethical Behavior, Diversity, Civil Discourse, and Educating Adults: A Literature Review.
- Introduction:The opening content should directly follow the title of the paper (repeated from the title page). In this section, list or summarize the issues you selected from the literature related to ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse, and provide a summary or road map for the content included in your paper.
- Overview of Issues:Begin the body of your paper with an overview of the issues related to ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse you chose for this review. Describe connections among these issues and their significance to adult education. Write in third person and include literature support.
- Diversity Issue Related to Specialization:Provide detailed descriptions and examples of how the issues you chose to review specifically relate to educating adults. Write in third person and include literature support.
- Ethical Behavior Issue Related to Specialization:Provide detailed descriptions and examples of how the issue you chose to review specifically relates to Adult Education. Write in third person and include literature support.
- Civil Discourse Issue Related to Specialization:Provide detailed descriptions and examples of how the issue you chose to review specifically relates to Adult Education. Write in third person and include literature support.
- Review of the Literature:The literature review should include a minimum of six references from peer-reviewed journal articles related to Adult Education. Analyze this scholarly literature, focusing on the connections between Adult Education and the issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse you chose to research. Continue writing in third person and cite the literature for support.
- Conclusion:Your conclusion should emphasize the main themes in your paper and provide a synthesis of the literature reviewed, with special attention to the connections and relationships among the issues you chose to research and your educational specialization.
- References:Include a minimum of five different scholarly, peer-reviewed journals (related to your field of specialization) that are also cited in the paper. Your citations must have references and your references should be included within your paper as in-text citations.
Ethical Behavior, Diversity, and Civil Discourse Scoring Guide
Due Date: Sat 5/30
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Describe connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.
20%Does not identify connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization. Identifies connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization. Describes connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization. Explains connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization. Analyze scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.
20%Does not explain scholarly literature focused on issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in education. Explains scholarly literature focused on issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in education. Analyzes scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization. Synthesizes findings of scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization. Evaluate challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse to a given educational specialization.
20%Does not describe challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse to a given educational specialization. Describes challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse to a given educational specialization. Evaluates challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse to a given educational specialization. Evaluates challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse to a given educational specialization, and makes connections to relevant practical examples. Support arguments with reference to scholarly literature.
20%Does not support arguments with reference to scholarly literature. Supports arguments with inconsistent reference to scholarly literature. Supports arguments with reference to scholarly literature. Supports arguments with exceptionally clear and precise reference to scholarly literature. Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
20%Does not organize content so that ideas flow logically with transitions. Organizes content with some logical flow, but some transitions are missing or unclear. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with clear main ideas, sufficient evidence, analysis, and linking information.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!