Ecological pest management and beneficial insects
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Ecological pest management and beneficial insects
Ecological pest management is an approach to managing pests in agriculture that emphasizes the use of natural and ecological processes to control pests and reduce the need for synthetic pesticides. Ecological pest management recognizes that pests are an integral part of the ecosystem and that controlling them with pesticides can have negative impacts on both the environment and human health.
One key component of ecological pest management is the use of beneficial insects. Beneficial insects are insects that naturally control pest populations by feeding on them, parasitizing them, or competing with them for resources. Some examples of beneficial insects include ladybugs, lacewings, and parasitic wasps. These insects can be encouraged to inhabit agricultural fields through the use of various strategies, such as planting cover crops, maintaining hedgerows and other habitat, and using insectary plants that provide food and shelter for beneficial insects.
Another important strategy for ecological pest management is crop rotation. Crop rotation involves alternating crops in a field from year to year to disrupt pest life cycles and reduce the buildup of pests in the soil. For example, a farmer might rotate between corn and soybeans, which have different pest problems, to prevent pests from becoming established in the soil. Crop rotation can also improve soil health by reducing the buildup of soil-borne diseases and improving soil structure and fertility.
Integrated pest management (IPM) is another approach to pest management that incorporates ecological pest management practices. IPM involves using a combination of tactics, including cultural, mechanical, and biological methods, to control pests while minimizing the use of synthetic pesticides. IPM also involves monitoring pest populations to determine when and where control measures are needed, and using economic thresholds to determine when the cost of controlling pests outweighs the benefits.
In addition to beneficial insects and crop rotation, other ecological pest management strategies include using natural predators and parasites, such as birds and bats, to control pest populations; using pheromone traps to attract and trap pests; and using crop covers, such as row covers, to physically exclude pests from crops.
Ecological pest management has several benefits over traditional pesticide-based pest management. First, it is more environmentally friendly, as it reduces the use of synthetic pesticides that can have negative impacts on non-target species and the environment. Second, ecological pest management can be more cost-effective in the long run, as it reduces the need for expensive pesticide applications. Finally, ecological pest management can lead to improved soil health and biodiversity, as it encourages the use of natural processes to control pests.
In conclusion, ecological pest management is an approach to pest management in agriculture that emphasizes the use of natural and ecological processes to control pests. Beneficial insects, crop rotation, and integrated pest management are some of the strategies used in ecological pest management. By reducing the use of synthetic pesticides and improving soil health and biodiversity, ecological pest management can help create a more sustainable and environmentally friendly agricultural system.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Ecological pest management and beneficial insects
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!