Determining Genetic Influence on Personality Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Determining Genetic Influence on Personality Assignment
5.10: Problems and Prospects for the Motive Perspective 65 Summary: The Motive Perspective 65
6: Genetics, Evolution, and Personality 67 6.1: Determining Genetic Influence on Personality 67
Box 6.1 Early Biological Views: Physique and Personality 68
6.1.1: Twin Study Method 68 6.1.2: Adoption Research 69
6.2: What Personality Qualities Are Genetically Influenced? 69
6.2.1: Temperaments 69 6.2.2: More Recent Views of Temperaments 70 6.2.3: Inheritance of Traits 70 6.2.4: Temperaments and the Five-Factor Model 70 6.2.5: How Distinct Are the Genetics of Other
Qualities? 71 6.2.6: Environmental Influences 71
6.3: Complications in Behavioral Genetics 72 6.3.1: Heritability Varies with the Environment 72 6.3.2: Correlations between Genetic and
Environmental Influences 72
6.4: Molecular Genetics and Genomics 73 6.4.1: Gene-by-Environment Interactions 74 6.4.2: Environmental Effects on Gene
Expression 74
6.5: Evolution and Human Behavior 75 6.5.1: Sociobiology and Evolutionary Psychology 75
Box 6.2 Theoretical Issue: Universal Adaptations and Why There Are Individual Differences 75
6.5.2: Genetic Similarity and Attraction 76 6.5.3: Avoidance of Incest 77 6.5.4: Mate Selection and Competition for Mates 77 6.5.5: Mate Retention and Other Issues 79 6.5.6: Aggression and the Young Male Syndrome 80
6.6: Assessment from the Genetic and Evolutionary Perspective 81
6.7: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Genetic and Evolutionary Perspective 81
6.7.1: Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder 81
Box 6.3 Living in a Postgenomic World 81 6.7.2: Substance Use and Antisocial Behavior 82 6.7.3: Evolution and Problems in Behavior 83 6.7.4: How Much Behavior Change Is Possible? 83
6.8: Problems and Prospects for the Genetic and Evolutionary Perspective 83 Summary: Genetics, Evolution, and Personality 84
7: Biological Processes and Personality 86 7.1: Eysenck’s Early Views on Brain Functions 87
7.2: Incentive Approach System 87
Contents ix
8.3.1: Id 107 8.3.2: Ego 107 8.3.3: Superego 108 8.3.4: Balancing the Forces 108
8.4: The Drives of Personality 109
Box 8.2 Distortion in Psychoanalytic Ideas by Translation and Cultural Distance 109
8.4.1: Life and Death Instincts 110 8.4.2: Catharsis 110
8.5: Anxiety and Mechanisms of Defense 111 8.5.1: Repression 111
Box 8.3 Unintended Effects of Thought Suppression 112
8.5.2: Denial 112 8.5.3: Projection 112 8.5.4: Rationalization and Intellectualization 113 8.5.5: Displacement and Sublimation 113 8.5.6: Research on Defenses 114
8.6: Psychosexual Development 114 8.6.1: The Oral Stage 114 8.6.2: The Anal Stage 115 8.6.3: The Phallic Stage 116
Box 8.4 The Theorist and the Theory: Freud’s Own Oedipal Crisis 117
8.6.4: The Latency Period 117 8.6.5: The Genital Stage 117
8.7: Exposing the Unconscious 117 8.7.1: The Psychopathology of Everyday Life 118 8.7.2: Dreams 119
8.8: Assessment from the Psychoanalytic Perspective 119
8.9: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Psychoanalytic Perspective 120
8.9.1: Origins of Problems 120 8.9.2: Behavior Change 120
Box 8.5 Repression, Disclosure, and Physical Health 121
8.9.3: Does Psychoanalytic Therapy Work? 121
8.10: Problems and Prospects for the Psychoanalytic Perspective 122 Summary: The Psychoanalytic Perspective 123
9: Psychosocial Theories 125 9.1: Object Relations Theories 125
Box 9.1 Ego Psychology 126 9.1.1: Self Psychology 127
9.2: Attachment Theory and Personality 127 9.2.1: Attachment Patterns in Adults 129 9.2.2: How Many Patterns? 129
Box 9.2 How Do You Measure Adult Attachment? 130
9.2.3: Stability and Specificity 130 9.2.4: Other Reflections of Adult Attachment 131
7.2.1: Behavioral Approach 87 7.2.2: More Issues in Approach 88 7.2.3: Neurotransmitters and the Approach
System 88
7.3: Behavioral Avoidance, or Withdrawal, System 89 7.3.1: Neurotransmitters and the Avoidance
System 90
7.4: Relating Approach and Avoidance Systems to Traits and Temperaments 90
7.4.1: The Role of Sociability 90 7.4.2: The Role of Impulsivity 91
7.5: Sensation Seeking, Constraint, and Effortful Control 91
7.5.1: Sensation Seeking 91 7.5.2: Relating Sensation Seeking to Traits and
Temperaments 92 7.5.3: Another Determinant of Impulse
and Restraint 92 7.5.4: Neurotransmitters and Impulse versus
Constraint 93
Box 7.1 Research Question: How Do You Measure Neurotransmitter Function? 93
7.6: Hormones and Personality 94 7.6.1: Hormones, the Body, and the Brain 94 7.6.2: Early Hormonal Exposure and
Behavior 95 7.6.3: Testosterone and Adult Personality 96
Box 7.2 Steroids: An Unintended Path to Aggression 97
7.6.4: Cycle of Testosterone and Action 98 7.6.5: Testosterone, Dominance, and
Evolutionary Psychology 98 7.6.6: Responding to Stress 99
7.7: Assessment from the Biological Process Perspective 100
7.7.1: Electroencephalograms 100 7.7.2: Neuroimaging 100
7.8: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Biological Process Perspective 101
7.8.1: Biological Bases of Anxiety and Depression 101
7.8.2: Biological Bases of Antisocial Personality 101
7.8.3: Biological Therapies 102
7.9: Problems and Prospects for the Biological Process Perspective 103 Summary: Biological Processes and Personality 103
8: The Psychoanalytic Perspective 105 Box 8.1 Was Freud Really the Sole Creator of Psychoanalysis? 106
8.1: Basic Themes 106
8.2: The Topographical Model of the Mind 106
8.3: The Structural Model of Personality 107
9.2.5: Attachment Patterns and the Five-Factor Model 132
Box 9.3 How Impactful Is Early Childhood Adversity? 133
9.3: Erikson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development 133 9.3.1: Ego Identity, Competence, and the
Experience of Crisis 133 9.3.2: Infancy 134 9.3.3: Early Childhood 135 9.3.4: Preschool 135 9.3.5: School Age 136 9.3.6: Adolescence 136
Box 9.4 The Theorist and the Theory: Erikson’s Lifelong Search for Identity 137
9.3.7: Young Adulthood 137 9.3.8: Adulthood 138 9.3.9: Old Age 139 9.3.10: The Epigenetic Principle 139 9.3.11: Identity as Life Story 139 9.3.12: Linking Erikson’s Theory to
Other Psychosocial Theories 140
9.4: Assessment from the Psychosocial Perspective 140 9.4.1: Object Relations, Attachment, and the
Focus of Assessment 140 9.4.2: Play in Assessment 140
9.5: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Psychosocial Perspective 141
9.5.1: Narcissism as a Disorder of Personality 141 9.5.2: Attachment and Depression 141 9.5.3: Behavior Change 141
9.6: Problems and Prospects for the Psychosocial Perspective 142 Summary: Psychosocial Theories 142
10: The Learning Perspective 144 10.1: Classical Conditioning 144
10.1.1: Basic Elements 145 10.1.2: Discrimination, Generalization, and
Extinction in Classical Conditioning 146
Box 10.1 What’s Going on in Classical Conditioning? 146
10.1.3: Emotional Conditioning 147
Box 10.2 Classical Conditioning and Attitudes 148
10.2: Instrumental Conditioning 148 10.2.1: The Law of Effect 148 10.2.2: Reinforcement and Punishment 149 10.2.3: Discrimination, Generalization, and
Extinction in Instrumental Conditioning 149 10.2.4: Schedules of Reinforcement 150 10.2.5: Reinforcement of Qualities of Behavior 151
10.3: Social and Cognitive Variations 151 10.3.1: Social Reinforcement 151 10.3.2: Vicarious Emotional Arousal 152 10.3.3: Vicarious Reinforcement 152
Box 10.3 Modeling and Delay of Gratification 153 10.3.4: What Really Is Reinforcement? 153 10.3.5: Efficacy Expectancies 153 10.3.6: Role of Awareness 154
10.4: Observational Learning 154 10.4.1: Attention and Retention 154 10.4.2: Production 155 10.4.3: Acquisition versus Performance 155
10.5: Modeling of Aggression and the Issue of Media Violence 156
10.6: Assessment from the Learning Perspective 157 10.6.1: Conditioning-Based Approaches 157 10.6.2: Social–Cognitive Approaches 157
10.7: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Learning Perspective 158
10.7.1: Classical Conditioning of Emotional Responses 158
10.7.2: Conditioning and Context 158 10.7.3: Instrumental Conditioning and
Maladaptive Behaviors 159 10.7.4: Social–Cognitive Approaches 159 10.7.5: Modeling-Based Therapy for Skill Deficits 160 10.7.6: Modeling and Responses to Fear 160 10.7.7: Therapeutic Changes in Efficacy
Expectancy 161
10.8: Problems and Prospects for the Learning Perspective 161 Summary: The Learning Perspective 162
11: Self-Actualization and Self-Determination 164
11.1: Self-Actualization 165 11.1.1: The Need for Positive Regard 165 11.1.2: Contingent Self-Worth 166
11.2: Self-Determination 166 11.2.1: Introjection and Identification 167 11.2.2: Need for Relatedness 168 11.2.3: Self-Concordance 168 11.2.4: Free Will 168
11.3: The Self and Processes of Defense 169
Box 11.1 How Can You Manage Two Kinds of Congruence Simultaneously? 169
11.3.1: Incongruity, Disorganization, and Defense 170 11.3.2: Self-Esteem Maintenance and Enhancement 170 11.3.3: Self-Handicapping 170 11.3.4: Stereotype Threat 171
11.4: Self-Actualization and Maslow’s Hierarchy of Motives 171
Box 11.2 The Theorist and the Theory: Abraham Maslow’s Focus on the Positive 172
11.4.1: Characteristics of Frequent Self-Actualizers 173 11.4.2: Peak Experiences 174
11.5: Existential Psychology 174
x Contents
11.5.1: The Existential Dilemma 175 11.5.2: Emptiness 175 11.5.3: Terror Management 175
11.6: Assessment from the Self-Actualization and Self-Determination Perspective 177
11.6.1: Interviews in Assessment 177
Box 11.3 Self-Actualization and Your Life 177 11.6.2: Measuring the Self-Concept by Q-Sort 178 11.6.3: Measuring Self-Actualization 178 11.6.4: Measuring Self-Determination
and Control 178
11.7: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Self-Actualization and Self-Determination Perspective 179
11.7.1: Client-Centered Therapy 179 11.7.2: Beyond Therapy to Personal Growth 180
11.8: Problems and Prospects for the Self-Actualization and Self-Determination Perspective 180 Summary: Self-Actualization and Self-Determination 181
12: The Cognitive Perspective 183 Box 12.1 Personal Construct Theory: Foreshadowing the Cognitive Perspective 184
12.1: Representing Your Experience of the World 184 12.1.1: Schemas and Their Development 184 12.1.2: Effects of Schemas 185 12.1.3: Semantic Memory, Episodic Memory,
Scripts, and Procedural Knowledge 185 12.1.4: Socially Relevant Schemas 186 12.1.5: Self-Schemas 186 12.1.6: Entity versus Incremental Mindsets 187 12.1.7: Attribution 187
12.2: Activation of Memories 188 12.2.1: Priming and the Use of Information 189 12.2.2: Nonconscious Influences on Behavior 190
12.3: Connectionist Views of Mental Organization 190
Box 12.2 What’s in a Name? 191 12.3.1: Dual-Process Models 192
Box 12.3 Delay of Gratification: The Role of Cognitive Strategies 193
12.3.2: Explicit and Implicit Knowledge 194
12.4: Broader Views on Cognition and Personality 194
Box 12.4 The Theorist and the Theory: Mischel and His Mentors 195
12.4.1: Cognitive Person Variables 195 12.4.2: Personality as a Cognitive–Affective
Processing System 196
12.5: Assessment from the Cognitive Perspective 197 12.5.1: Think-Aloud, Experience Sampling,
and Self-Monitoring 197 12.5.2: Contextualized Assessment 197
12.6: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Cognitive Perspective 198
12.6.1: Information-Processing Deficits 198
12.6.2: Depressive Self-Schemas 198 12.6.3: Cognitive Therapy 199
12.7: Problems and Prospects for the Cognitive Perspective 199 Summary: The Cognitive Perspective 200
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!