Confidence about Life Effects of Generalized Optimism
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Confidence about Life Effects of Generalized Optimism
Disengagement 209
Box 13.2 Confidence about Life: Effects of Generalized Optimism 210
13.2.10: Partial Disengagement 211
13.3: Further Themes in Self-Regulation 211 13.3.1: Approach and Avoidance 211 13.3.2: Intention-Based and Stimulus-Based
Action 211 13.3.3: Self-Regulation as Self-Control 213
13.4: Assessment from the Self-Regulation Perspective 213 13.4.1: Assessment of Self-Regulatory Qualities 213
Box 13.3 Reduction of Self-Regulation: Deindividuation and Alcohol 214
13.4.2: Assessment of Goals 214
13.5: Problems in Behavior, and Behavior Change, from the Self-Regulation Perspective 214
13.5.1: Problems as Conflicts among Goals and Lack of Strategy Specifications 214
13.5.2: Problems from an Inability to Disengage 215
13.5.3: Self-Regulation and the Process of Therapy 215
13.5.4: Therapy Is Training in Problem Solving 216
13.6: Problems and Prospects for the Self-Regulation Perspective 216 Summary: The Self-Regulation Perspective 217
Contents xi
14.2.1: Impulse and Restraint 225 14.2.2: Individual versus Group Needs 226
14.3: Combining Perspectives 226 14.3.1: Eclecticism 227 14.3.2: Biology and Learning as Complementary
Influences on Personality 227
14.4: Which Theory Is Best? 228 Summary: Overlap and Integration among Perspectives 228
Glossary 230
References 237
Credits 282
Name Index 284
Subject Index 297
14: Overlap and Integration among Perspectives 219
14.1: Similarities among Perspectives 220 14.1.1: Psychoanalysis and Evolutionary
Psychology 220 14.1.2: Psychoanalysis and Self-Regulation 221 14.1.3: Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Processes 221 14.1.4: Social Learning, Cognitive, and
Self-Regulation Views 223 14.1.5: Maslow’s Hierarchy and Hierarchies
of Self-Regulation 224 14.1.6: Self-Actualization and Self-Regulation 224 14.1.7: Traits and Their Equivalents in
Other Models 225
14.2: Recurrent Themes, Viewed from Different Angles 225
xii Contents
secondary goal is to consider the usefulness of blending theoretical viewpoints, treating theories as complemen- tary, rather than competing.
In revising, we’ve tried very hard to make the content accessible. We use an informal, conversational style, and we’ve used examples of how the ideas can apply to one’s own life. We hope these qualities make the book engaging and enjoyable, as well as informative.
New to This Edition • Incorporates important developments in the field of
personality psychology over the past 5 years or so. • Cutting edge material has been added on topics in
molecular genetics and genomics (Chapter 6) without loss of continuity with earlier versions.
New material has been added on the biological under- pinnings of impulsiveness (Chapter 7) expanding on the previous edition’s coverage.
Expanded coverage of “mindsets” as a facet of the cog- nitive perspective (Chapter 12).
More detailed coverage of the role of mental contrasting in the self-regulation perspective (Chapter 13).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!