Cytoprotecting For Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Cytoprotecting For Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
All papers must include: 1. Title Page
- Abstract Page + Ultraminimal Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Figures and Tables
- References
Article Title: Provide a concise, informative title, with no unnecessary words
Your first line starts here.
The Abstract should be structured into four paragraphs not exceeding 250 words total. It must be written in complete sentences, using past tense, active verbs, and third person. Abbreviations should be avoided. No literature should be cited in this section.
The abstract must include your testable hypothesis and how you tested it.
Sections:
- Hypothesis: describe the hypothesis of the study
- Methods: identify the study design and statistical methods used
- Results: describe the outcome of the study and the statistical significance, if appropriate
- Conclusions: state the significance of the results
- Provide a word count for the Abstract
- Keywords: Following the abstract, provide 3 to 10 keywords for indexing purposes
Ultramini Abstract (at the bottom of the Abstract Page): Maximum 50 words.
Provide 1 to 3 sentences of no more than 50 words total, containing the essence of the paper.
The next line starts here.
The Introduction should provide a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, and the proposed approach or solution. The introduction must be:
- Well referenced
- Begins with an impactful statement
- Narrows to the focus of the paper
Citations will be written in parenthesis in a consistent format throughout the paper.
The next line starts here.
Should contain enough information to allow the study to be replicated
- Databases used
- Search Strategy
- Search Terms
- Inclusion / exclusion criteria
- Other relevant information
The next line starts here.
The results should be presented with clarity and precision. Results should be explained, but largely without referring to the literature. Discussion, speculation and detailed interpretation of data should not be included in the Results.
- Results should be discussed in a manner that synthesizes results of multiple studies
- Include an Evidence Table as an Appendixto the paper
The next line starts here.
Authors should explain what the results mean and how the results relate to the hypothesis presented as the basis of the study. The discussion should interpret the findings and should include:
- Explanation of the findings
- Interpretation of the Results
- Limitations
- Future directions
- Conclusion: State the conclusions in a few sentences at the end of the paper.
The next line starts here.
Examples: Figure 1. Write the figure’s title here.
(Note: Insert Figure 1 here; please delete these lines before submitting this form.)
Table 1. Write the table’s title here.
(Note: Insert Table 1 here. Please, delete these lines before submitting this form.)
The next line starts here.
General information- how to cite: ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7256 /)
Authors’ last names and initials; title of article; journal name; date; volume number, and inclusive pages (list all authors when six or fewer; > six, list six and add et al):
Example:
- Tilleman T.R., Richards W.G., Zellos L., Johnson B.E., Jaklitsch M.T., Mueller J., Yeap B.Y., Mujoomdar A.A., Ducko C.T., Bueno R., Sugarbaker D.J. Extrapleural pneumonectomy followed by intracavitary intraoperative hyperthermic cisplatin with pharmacologic cytoprotection for treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase II prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Aug;138(2):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.02.046.
- Bruzik J.P. Splicing glue: a role for SR proteins in HYPERLINK “http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8878012″transHYPERLINK “http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8878012” splicing? Microb Pathog. 1996 Sep;21(3):149-55.
The next line with the references starts here .
Effective Formatting:
- Use upper- and lowercase type: It is much easier to read than all capital letters
- Use a consistent typeface and size (i.e. Times New Roman, 12 point)
- Double space your paper
- Include page numbers
Manuscript Submission:
All Preliminary Drafts and Final Papers must be submitted via Moodle (LMS) + via email to your mentor. Learn more about author guidelines: http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines
http://www.ijms.info/external/files/instructions_authors.pdf
A HYPERLINK “http://cdn.elsevier.com/assets/pdf_file/0020/111377/author-pack.pdf”guideHYPERLINK “http://cdn.elsevier.com/assets/pdf_file/0020/111377/author-pack.pdf” to publishing in scholarly journals – HYPERLINK “http://cdn.elsevier.com/assets/pdf_file/0020/111377/author-pack.pdf”Elsevier
http://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-thoracic-and-cardiovascular-surgery/0022-5223/guide-for-authors
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!