critical thinking and ethics questions philosophy
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
questions on critical thinking and ethics .. philosophy ..
1) Please, articulate Bernard Williams’s arguments on Utilitarianism and Integrity (YB, pgs.40—44; and on
- b) Two Kinds of Remoter Effect?
2) Articulate Dr. Robert Bozick’s positions on “The Experience Machine” (YB, pgs.45—47?).
3) please, articulate Dr. J. L. Mackie’s arguments on
- a) “The Subjectivity of Values”? (YB, pgs48—59);
- b) And on the subsections—Moral Skepticism;
- c) Standards of Exclusion;
- d) Hypothetical and Categorical Imperatives;
- e) The Claim to Objectivity;
- f) The Argument from Relativity;
- g) The Argument from Queerness,
- H) and his conclusions?
4) Articulate C. S. Lewis’s positions on
- a) “Our Sense of Right and Wrong” 🙁 YB, pgs.60—64; and on the subsections,
- b) The Law of Human Nature,
- C) and his conclusions?
5) Carefully articulate Dr. Emmanuel Kant’s work, the “Categorical Imperative: (YB, pgs.65 through 68,
- b) And the concluding remarks?
6) Articulate the Author’s Piece on Aristotle: Virtues: (YB. Pgs.69—75?
7) Articulate Mr. Frederic Nietzsche’s Arguments on “Master Morality and Slave Morality”, be very brief, but be sure to articulate the arguments in a succinct sentences?
8) Articulate Virginia Held’s arguments
- a) On Caring Relations and Principles of Justice: (YB.pags.80—86; and on the subsections—
- b) The Controversy;
- c) Differences among Feminists;
- d) A Look at Some Cases;
- e) Models of Morality?
9) please, articulate Mary Anne Warren’s arguments on
- a) “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion and Postscript on Infanticide”: (YB, PGS.87—98); and on, subsections—
- b) On the Definition of ‘Human’;
- c) Defining the Moral Community;
- d) Fetal Development and the Right to life;
- e) Potential Personhood and the Right to Life;
- f) Postscript on Infanticide,
- G) and her conclusions?
10) Articulate the Piece/Article from Don Marquis, on “Why Abortion Is Immoral”: (YB, pgs.99— 105?
11) Please, articulate for me, Judith Jarvis Thomson’s Piece on “A Defense of Abortion”? (YB, pgs. 106—122?
12) Please, articulate Professor, Peter Singer’s arguments on “All Animals Are Equal”: (YB, Pgs.123—132?
13) Please, articulate the arguments on “Torturing Puppies and Eating Meat: It’s All in Good Taste”, by Dr. Alastair Norcross. (YB, Pgs.133— 140?
14) please, articulate Tibor R. Machan’s presentation on the topic: “Do Animals Have Rights?”(YB, pgs.141— 152), and on the subsections:
- b) Why might animals Have Rights?
- c) Why We May Use Animals;
- d) Why Individual Have Rights?
- e) Where Is There Room for Animal Rights?
- f) And the Closing points?
15) Articulate and report to me what you gathered from Professor Pater Singer’s arguments on—“Famine, Affluence, and Morality” (YB, pgs. 154 through I63?
16) Please, articulate and report in a very brief literature, Stuart Rachels’ arguments on “Poverty and Parenthood”. (YB, pgs. 164—180); and on the subsections—
- b) The Biggest Decisions in Life;
- c) The Famine Relief argument against Having Children;
- d) Connections to Inger’s Argument;
- e) Five Objections?
17) Please, report your articulation of Lous P. Pojman’s arguments on “A Defense of the Death Penalty”: (YB, pgs.182— 190); and on the subsections—
- b) Retribution, & Deterrence,
- C) and his conclusion?
18) Please, articulate Dr. Stephen B. Bright’s positions on “Why the United States Will Join the Rest of the World in Abandoning Capital Punishment”: (YB, pgs. 191— 202); and the subsections—
- b) A human Rights Violation That Undermines the Standing and Moral Authority of the United States;
- c) Arbitrary and Unfair Infliction;
- d) A Warning That Something Is Terribly Wrong: Innocent People Condemned to Death;
- e) The Two Most Important Decisions—Made by Prosecutors;
- f) The Role of Racial Bias;
- g) The death Sentence for Being Assigned the Worst Lawyer,
- H) and his Conclusions?
19) Articulate and briefly report your grasp of Atul Gawande’s Arguments on the topic, “Hellhole”: (YB, pags.203—220)?
20) Please, articulate the arguments of Dr. Douglas P. Lackey, on the Topic, “The Ethics of War and Peace”, (YB, pgs221—-229, and be sure to comment in your articulation on the subsections—
- b) “How to Fight”?
21) Please, articulate Professor, John Rawls’s arguments on “Fifty Years after Hiroshima”: (YB, pgs. 230—-237?
- B) Articulate Thomas Nagel’s arguments on “What Is Wrong with Terrorism?” (YB, pgs.238—240?).
22) Articulate David Luban’s arguments on “Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb”. (YB.pgs.241—254); be sure to articulate,
- a) The Five Aims of Torture;
- b) The Ticking Bomb;
- c) Torture as a Practice,
- D) and his conclusions?
23) please, report your articulation of Michael Huemer’s Piece on “America’s Unjust Drug War”: (YB, pgs.255—266);
- b) and comment on the following subsections—
- c) Drugs and Harm to Users; Drugs and Harm to Others;
- d) The Injustice of Drug Prohibition,
- e) and his Conclusions?
23B) Please, articulate Bertrand Russell’s Piece on “Our Sexual Ethics”: (YB, pags.269—275)?
24) Articulate Dr. Andrew Sullivan’s Arguments on what is titled: “A Few Words about Gay Marriage”: (YB, pgs.276—277?
25) articulate the arguments on “Same-Sex Marriage and the Argument from Public Disagreement” by David Boom. (YB, pgs. 278—- 288?
26) Articulate for me, Mr. Nicholas Dixson’s positions on his work titled, “Alcohol and Rape”. (YB, pgs.289—-300 ?
And comment on the following as well:
b)Two Limiting Cases;
- c) Problematic Intermediate Cases: Impaired Sex;
- c) Should We Push Men For Impaired Sex?
- d) and his Conclusions?
27) Please, articulate Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from the Birmingham City Jail”. (YB. Pgs.301—308)?
28) Articulate Professor, Peter Singer’s positions on his Piece, titled: “Is Racial Discrimination Arbitrary”. (YB, pgs. 309—320?
29) Please, articulate James Rachels’s arguments on “In Defense of Quotas”. (YB, pgs. 321—-335)?
- b) Comment on the Justification of Quotas especially,
- c) and other serious points he made?
30) Articulate Linda Hirshman’s work: “Homeward Bound”. (YB, pgs.336—344.),
- b) and comment on The Truth about Elite Women;
- c) The Failure of Choice Feminism;
- d) What Is to be Done;
- c) Why Do We Care?
- d) And her Conclusions?
31) Articulate “The Case for Open Immigration”, by Michael Huemer. (YB, pgs. 345— 347)?
32) Please, articulate, James Rachels’s positions on “The Morality of Euthanasia”. (YB. pgs. 348— 352); and comment on—
- B) The Utilitarian Version of the Argument;
- c) Doing What Is in Everyone’s Best Interests,
- d) and his conclusions?
33) please, articulate “The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia” arguments by J Gay-Williams: (YB, pgs.353— 357); and comment on the following:
b)The Argument from Nature;
- c) The Argument from Self-Interest;
d)The Argument from Practical Effects,
- e) and His conclusions?
34) Articulate the arguments on “The New Eugenics” by Matt Ridley. (YB, pgs.358—364);
- b) and comment on “A Sad Legacy;
- c) No Nightmare Scenarios,
- d) and his conclusions?
35) Articulate for me, John A. Robertson’s article on “Human Cloning and the Challenges of Regulation”. (YB, pgs.365— 371)?
RUBRIC
Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!