Creating a Competitive Advantage Research Paper
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Effective Leadership
Creating a Competitive Advantage Research Paper
Effective leadership can be identified by looking at the elements in a leaders personal landscape. A leaders landscape identifies characteristics, practices, and behaviors that show confidence in position as well as their ability. Decisiveness, honesty, trust, and the ability to motivate others are traits of a leaders landscape. Proactivity, reliability, and intelligence are other traits of a leaders landscape. A leadership landscape can be composed of a plethora of practices and behaviors, but the innate and important element of a leadership landscape is knowing how and when to apply each trait.
Proactivity
Proactive leaders tend to champion company missions and achieve goals more often and with greater ease. Where reactive leaders deal with events as they come, proactive leaders anticipate events and plan accordingly. Being proactive simplifies leadership, increases positive results and encourages a more joyful workplace. This type of leader inspires other to rise to each occasion, embrace the company mission and to do what needs to be done and what is right. They give and expect honest appraisals and expect team members to be honest and full of integrity. By expecting the best from situations and employees, they tend to receive it. They tend to manage themselves appropriately as well as inspire others. Proactive leaders are compassionate, loyal, integrity-filled, straightforward, calm, direct, fair, polite, hopeful and thoughtful.
Reliability
Reliability is having the ability to create the mechanisms and infrastructure to provide ongoing support for your teams. Employees are much more likely to respond to direction from someone who is confident, cooperative, optimistic, and supportive. Leaders that have proven reliability can create a culture of trust within their teams, and consequently are able to gain the commitment of each team member to work toward common goals. These leaders listen to their employees’ ideas and concerns. They lead by example. They are grateful for their employees. They learn from their mistakes and they take responsibility for them.
Intelligence
To do an effective job for the organization, the tasks must be performed intelligently. Making good decisions starts with the ability to collect relevant data, analyze the data, and then taking the collected information to make an executive decision. Successfully having the skillset of intelligence stems from the collaboration of cognitive intelligence and emotional intelligence. Cognitive intelligence adds the ability to make good decisions and lead an organization while emotional intelligence adds the ability to connect on an emotional level. Putting the two components of cognitive and emotional intelligence together presents a critical skillset needed for an effective leader.
Effective Leadership Pipeline
Having policies and procedures in place is how most organizations and companies operate effectively and efficiently. Having coherent operations along with the processes and procedures also helps companies operate efficiently. But none of this is possible without the proper leadership. It is critical for organizations to select the right leaders. There are many benefits that can result from a powerful lead and culture. The power stems from a leader + follower relationship. This relationship becomes effective when the leader + follower relationship is developed, making a connection, guided by the behaviors, attributes, practices, of the leader. So how do organizations develop a pipeline of talent that will become the platform of success? This is done by recruiting excellent leadership. These are individuals that know who they are and what they believe in as leaders and for success. The organizational affluence can be obtained by having the right people in place. Who are the right people? The right people are identified by the skills and attributes that will bring the success results to the overall mission and goals of the organization. The performance of the organization depends on these employees. The organizations competitive advantage is determined by managing, developing, and maintaining talented individuals. Sounds easy right? Not always. Obtaining and maintaining the right talent can sometimes be a struggle for an organization if it is not made a priority. Prioritizing the type of leaders recruited determines the growth and prosperity of the organization. Building the right team strengthens the long-term goals which in turn strengthens the competitive advantage.
Creating a Competitive Advantage
How can a company create a competitive advantage? There are many ways this can happen but lets focus on a few more common approaches. The success of a company depends on the leadership and the overall talent. Making the commitment to build a bank of cultivating leaders can maintain enthusiasm, energy, and confidence throughout the entire organization. The leadership talent bank consists of individuals with a strong personal brand of leadership. The skills and traits needed are people that hone self-awareness; character, integrity, self-efficacy, and authenticity. These individuals also have ambition, boldness, visions, and resilience. Their persona speaks inspiration, selflessness, and courage. And they serve with appreciation, patience, composure, enthusiasm, and accountability. The listed characteristics are the ingredients for an exceptional leader that holds the talents, skills, and drive to effectively and efficiently sustain a competitive advantage.
The way the team is targeted, lead, managed, motivated, and influenced determines the level of success for the organization. Creating a strong, positive leadership pool and talent bank typically reflects an average of over 50% high-performers, more energetic employees, focused and trustworthy teammates, and a base of loyalty. Another way to create that competitive advantage is by developing talent. This responsibly falls heavily on leadership. Having an honest assessment and view of the strengths and weaknesses of the organization helps the leadership cultivate a workforce that has a strategic focus to be successful.
Examples of Ways to Developing Leaders:
Motivation
· Continuously motivate and encourage others to drive to develop.
Developmental Needs
· Asses your strengths and weaknesses and address areas that may need improvement. Help support the improvement of others.
Core Competencies
· Identity the competencies to be effective such as intelligence, character, empathy. Lead bby example.
Organizational change and effective management are other key players in the creation of a competitive advantage. Many organizations are being faced with the rapid evolution of change, therefore, it is imperative to adapt to changing demands and conditions accordingly. There will be the constant need to adjust to new trends and technologies, train and retrain, solve new problems, and be well versed to remain competitive. Talented leadership will help to cultivate and encourage a learning culture that will be prepared for changes as they arise. An organization can secure a competitive place by implementing leaders that support a learning culture, encourage consistency of exchanging new ideas, shared information, and benefit from shared knowledge and skillsets.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|