CPMGT/300 Sarah Pedersen COVID-19 Relief Assistance Initiative
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
COVID-19 Relief Assistance Initiative
In response to the ongoing global pandemic, ABC Care Co. believes we have an even larger commitment to ensuring the safety of our community. With medical facilities having difficulty providing services and medical equipment, it is imperative we take swift action anywhere we can. That is why Project Team Alpha proposes the following project to be approved and financed immediately: The COVID-19 Rapid Relief Initiative.
Project Team Alpha is committed to opening the Texas facility no later than June 1st, working with all relevant and identified stakeholders to ensure that this new deadline is met, all while maintaining safety and quality standards. We will know we are successful by adhering to state and local laws, financial and time-driven benchmarks set forth by the business, and a satisfied community.
The Problem
The grand opening of our new facility in Texas is currently scheduled for July 1st. Due to the outbreak of COVID-19 and a shortage of testing sites, many people in our community need to be tested, but are unable to. This is an enormous public safety concern and needs to be addressed immediately. That is why our Project Team Alpha requests to proceed with finalization early.
The facility is built, the medical supplies are ready to be delivered, and our staff is trained and ready to start. However, with the government “stay-at-home” orders given earlier in the month, our interior finishing team has been delayed completing the final installations. The project team overseeing this has stated completion could be guaranteed and inspected no later than May 25th with proper alignment between stakeholders.
The Solution
Project Team Alpha recommends the following steps to assemble, develop, and manage the project team:
- Encourage contracted architect to move contractors from “per cost” to “working” time and materials. This approach will cost slightly little more due to contractor overtime being paid out, but the program will remain within the original budget of $100M. (FIXR, 2020).
- Coordinate inspection with architect, city, and state inspector.
- Bring cross-functional project teams in to discuss how we can work together, around each other’s schedule to determine when the medical supplies and equipment delivery deadlines could be met.
- With HR, coordinate employee onboarding and deployment with department heads to ensure all badges, access credentials, and systems are provided before opening.
- Ensure program leads and ABC Care Co. executive teams receive daily status reports to monitor progress, cost, and time spent.
Project Sponsorship and Project Leadership During Project Execution
During this period, The COVID-19 Rapid Relief Initiative have identified problems and solutions to the project. It is important the project sponsorship give project managers clear/concise mandate and set the level of authority; this will allow mangers to execute within the limits of the project. Within their authority, the sponsorship will ensure all plans are achievable and realistic. We will also assist in resolving any issues that have occurred without overstepping the leadership.
It is important the project leadership continues to create trust and keep problems from escalating. The project leadership can foresee issues/problems with what may lead to cost effectiveness and the quality of the project. The importance of this project continues under the leadership vision of safety is first and foremost will continue, during the project execution all levers of leadership have implement their skillset and maintained a level of the importance of COVID-19 Rapid Relief Initiative for the community.
Conclusion
Although we would be opening for business early, it is truly the doctors, patients, employees, and the community who will see the benefit from our Texas facility opening ahead of schedule. It is our duty to ensure that we do everything we can during this trying time. With the completion of this project and adherence to the guidelines above, we will be in a position to better serve our friends and neighbors tomorrow and for years to come. Project Team Alpha hopes the executive team takes this project into careful consideration.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!