Order ID 6463784949 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Sources/References 6 Number of Pages 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions Just make sure you answer all the given questions (long with details) , and follow the guideline.you have to follow the guideline to make case analysis 8 pages long, and make sure that the analysis answers all the 6 questions. if you read the guideline it will be more clear. think of the questions as the core contentStrategy Case Analysis Rubric Linked to Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)
Bus 400 Undergraduate
Critical Thinking (CLO 1)
Language & Communication (CLO 2)
A – Exemplary i. Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the concepts of business strategy and organizational structure. ii. Draws extensively on evidence in case, the textbook, class discussion and written guidelines to support conclusions.
iii. Is well thought out and reflects application of critical thinking, problem solving, and creativity
iv. Is complete—all sections are included and information required is included
v. Issues are stated clearly and described comprehensively
vi. Analysis shows excellent interpretation, e.g., strategic implications
i. Recognizes the importance of strategic decision-making. ii. Communicates professionally and effectively.
iii. Few spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Evidence of proofing/editing. Virtually error free.
iv. Appropriate use of business vocabulary and language
v. Sentences are clear
vi. Parallelism in headings, bullets, etc.
vii. Demonstrates detailed attention to organization, formatting and style.
viii. Transition, introductory and summary paragraphs present throughout.
B – Accomplished i. Is well thought out in most areas but discussion is incomplete in a few areas ii. Uses evidence in the case, the textbook, class discussion and written guidelines to support most analysis.
iii. Has application of critical thinking and problem solving that is apparent.
iv. All sections are included; some information and transitions are incomplete.
v. Strategic analysis addresses the major issues.
vi. Analysis shows good interpretation, e.g., strategic implications
i. Decision-making recognizes most important strategic issues. ii. Errors easily identified but they do not impede communication
iii. Good use of vocabulary and word choice
iv. Evidence of proof-reading but some sentences not clear
v. Parallelism in headings, bullets, etc.
i. Most of the format is consistent
ii. Some awkward transitions, but overall logical flow of information.
C – Developing i. Summarizes the case but little critical analysis ii. Has some application of critical thinking that is apparent
iii. Has some factual errors, inconsistencies or sections missing
iv. Important issues are mentioned but not developed or convincing
i. Analysis is not strategic; poor decision quality throughout several sections ii. Errors impede communication—not professional
iii. Low-level use of vocabulary and word choice
iv. Clear need to proof for clarity and grammar
v. Limited number of sources
D – Beginning i. Provides inconsistent information for solution ii. Has no apparent application of critical thinking
iii. Has no clear goal
iv. Major parts and strategy tools are missing
v. Has significant factual errors, misconceptions, or misinterpretations
i. No evidence of strategic decision quality. ii. Numerous spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors throughout document
iii. Poor use of vocabulary and word choice
iv. Limited number of sources
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!