Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure
Running head: FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE 1
FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE 4
Functional Structure
Definition
All organizations operate using different structures based on the nature of their operations. These structures make it more effective and efficient based on the manner of implementation. There are four main organizational structures where the most commonly used structure is known as a functional structure. Under this structure, an organization is divided into various units based on the functionality of the group. The groups can be subdivided based on a number of factors such as production, sales and marketing.
Summary
The article by (Ashkenas, Ulrich, Jick & Kerr, 2015), offers a good outlook on the main advantages and disadvantages of using the functional organization structure. The article compares these advantages with the other commonly used structure; the divisional structure, which, according to the journal, is commonly adopted by the multinationals. Besides the advantages and disadvantages discussed, it is important to highlight that the author is attempting to find flexibility in organizational structure whereby he is looking for the possibility of overcoming the rigidity of barriers created by organizational structures. The author defines the ideal company as the boundaryless organization that should not be defined or segmented by a specific organizational structure. He defines the company as one organized in the best way to suit its operations in the most effective and efficient way. Also, to perform any operation management skills are required in any organization. This will help the organization to reduce the cost of the project.
Discussion
This paper highlights both strengths and weaknesses of the two structures, giving the readers an opportunity to decide themselves, which is the best strategy to adopt based on the arguments. I chose to discuss the functional structure since it appears to carry more weight with regard to a more balanced and flexible strategy that cuts across the variations in company objectives and operations. One of the main advantages is the cost-effectiveness of having groups that are tasked with similar responsibilities. The alternative divisional structure requires experts in a given field to be spread across all the divisions, and a form of redundancy may occur. It is also more effective in terms of maximizing output from the staff if they are grouped together to work as a team with the management that is overseeing the group coming from the same class of expertise. The arguments presented in the paper are quite accurate, and I tend to agree with most of the arguments, and moreover, the act of leaving the conclusion to the reader makes it even the more informative and freer from bias. Besides the neutral opinion being left for the reader, I was elevated to a new realization from the author’s perspective of rising beyond the shackles that define and put a constraint on an organization. These views channel the optimization of an organization’s operations through the use of unique structures that suit their company as a unit rather than the application of general structures that force the company into a shape defined by the structure, whether it is functional or divisional, as defined by the theorists who came up with the ideas. This aspect of the study reveals an innovative attribute about the authors mindset and his ability to overcome glass ceilings created by existent infrastructure. The aspects of reducing the cost will help the organization grow better.
References
Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., & Kerr, S. (2015). The Boundaryless Organization.: Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure. John Wiley & Sons.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!