Artificial intelligence: AI bias and ethics
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Artificial intelligence: AI bias and ethics
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an increasingly important tool in many industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology. However, like all technologies, AI is not without its ethical and social concerns. One of the most pressing issues in AI is the issue of bias.
AI bias refers to the tendency of AI systems to produce results that are systematically biased in favor of certain groups or against others. This can occur when the data used to train AI systems is itself biased or when the algorithms used to analyze the data are designed in a way that reflects implicit biases or prejudices. In either case, the result is that the AI system produces outputs that are unfair or discriminatory.
There are a number of examples of AI bias in practice. For example, in the field of criminal justice, AI systems are used to predict the likelihood of a defendant reoffending. However, research has shown that these systems are often biased against people of color, leading to unfair sentencing decisions. Similarly, in healthcare, AI systems are used to diagnose diseases and recommend treatments. However, if the data used to train these systems is biased towards certain groups or demographics, this can lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatments.
To address the issue of AI bias, it is important to take a number of steps. One important step is to ensure that the data used to train AI systems is representative and unbiased. This can involve collecting data from a diverse range of sources and ensuring that the data is balanced in terms of gender, race, and other demographic factors. In addition, it is important to carefully review and test the algorithms used to analyze the data to ensure that they are free from biases or prejudices.
Another important step is to develop ethical guidelines for the use of AI. This can involve setting standards for the responsible use of AI systems, as well as guidelines for how these systems should be developed and deployed. For example, guidelines might include requirements for transparency and explainability, so that users can understand how the system is making decisions.
It is also important to involve a wide range of stakeholders in discussions about AI bias and ethics. This can include AI developers, policymakers, researchers, and members of affected communities. By engaging in open and transparent dialogue, we can identify and address potential biases and work towards creating more equitable and just AI systems.
Finally, it is important to monitor and evaluate AI systems over time to ensure that they are producing fair and unbiased results. This can involve ongoing testing and evaluation of AI systems, as well as the development of metrics to measure the impact of these systems on different groups and demographics.
In conclusion, AI bias is an important issue that requires careful attention and consideration. By taking steps to address bias in AI systems, we can ensure that these technologies are used in a fair and responsible manner, and that they do not perpetuate or exacerbate existing inequalities in society. Through ongoing dialogue, monitoring, and evaluation, we can work towards creating AI systems that are truly equitable and just.
Artificial intelligence: AI bias and ethics
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |

|
 |
Artificial intelligence: AI bias and ethics
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!