Ancient Drugs and The Future of Pharmacology Reflective Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Ancient Drugs and The Future of Pharmacology Reflective Essay
INSTRUCTIONS {READ THESE CAREFULLY}
Use materials covered as part of this course and from elsewhere to answer the following questions. These questions are reflective inquiries or have significant reflective components; answer accordingly. In other words, reflect deeply. The answer to each question should be at least 250 words and there is NO maximum limit.
Course Improvement {2 points each}
Question #1
Which of the Learning Activities did you find the most interesting? Why? Which Learning Activity was the most helpful in understanding the importance of learning about the history of our profession? Why?
Question #2
Given that this is an online course, were the weekly reflections and their deadlines useful in keeping you moving forward through the course? What alternative methods to the weekly reflections do you suggest that could be used to gauge your progress through the material and assess your comprehension of it?
Question #3
What pertinent topics, not covered in the course, do you feel might be important to add to this course? Why? Should they be added to the content or replace something (what?)?
Great Moments {5 points}
Question #4
What new moment would you add to Great Moments in Pharmacy series painted by artist Robert Thom?
Draw, sketch, or illustrate your ‘moment” someway;
Write the caption that goes below the picture; and
Explain your rationale for making this a “Great Moment”.
( This question could be difficult; just use your imagination).
Learning from the Past, Going Forward {5 points}
Question #5
- a) How did your views on Pharmacists and the Profession of Pharmacy changed?
- b) Pharmacy is a rapidly changing profession. Where do you see the profession in 10 years?
- c) What do you think will be important skills you will need to practice in the future?
Apply wisdom about pharmacy’s past to guide evolving changes in the pharmacy profession.
After digesting 10 weeks’ worth of historical content on your profession, there should have been some effect on your prior perceptions of Pharmacy.
Creativity {7 points}
Question #6
Design a unique history of pharmacy learning activity for this course:
Create a descriptive title;
Write a short introduction (explaining the overall objective and purpose of the learningexercise);
List the steps to be followed or questions to be answered by the students as part of the assignment;
What is the desired end product? and
How it would be graded.
Creativity is rewarded here!!
Format
Your reflection should be formatted in the same matter as the questions, with the question number listed and the corresponding answer given below it. The answer to each question should be at least 250 words and there is NO maximum limit.
Reflections must be posted by the due date using 12-point, Times New Roman font, and 1.5 line spacing.
Please post your EOS Comprehensive Reflective Assessment as Microsoft Word document; do NOT post in PDF format.
Individual question grading rubrics
The below rubrics will guide the grading for the questions. Course Improvement (all three questions)
Great Moments
0 points = reflections do not demonstrate evidence of critical thinking.
2.5 points = multiple parts missing or reflections show minimal analysis andsynthesis to create a strong post that partially states the case and contains minimalevidence
4 points = only 1 part missing or reflections show evidence of critical thinking at aproficient level
5 points = detailed, unique, creative, reflections show evidence of critical thinkingat a high level.Learning from the Past, Going Forward
0 points = reflections do not demonstrate evidence of critical thinking.
2.5 points = multiple parts missing or reflections show minimal analysis andsynthesis to create a strong post that partially states the case and contains minimalevidence
4 points = only 1 part missing or reflections show evidence of critical thinking at aproficient level
5 points = detailed, unique, creative, reflections show evidence of critical thinkingat a high level.Creativity
0 points = reflections do not demonstrate evidence of critical thinking.
2.5 points = multiple parts missing or reflections show minimal analysis andsynthesis to create a strong post that partially states the case and contains minimalevidence
4 points = only 1 part missing or reflections show evidence of critical thinking at aproficient level
5 points = detailed, unique, creative, reflections show evidence of critical thinking
0 points = no answer; no discernable meaning; used a reference’s definition; no reflection
1 point = minimal response; no unique details, minimal reflection
20 points = detailed, unique, reflective answers
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!