Advancements in gene editing technology
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Advancements in gene editing technology
Gene editing technology has rapidly advanced in recent years, revolutionizing the field of genetics and providing new possibilities for disease treatment and prevention. This technology allows for precise manipulation of genetic material, opening up a range of possibilities for targeted gene therapy, disease prevention, and even genetic modification of embryos.
One of the most well-known gene editing tools is CRISPR-Cas9, a technique that allows for precise changes to be made to DNA sequences. This tool works by using RNA molecules to target specific DNA sequences and then using the Cas9 enzyme to cut the DNA. This allows for precise modifications to be made to the DNA sequence, including insertion, deletion, or replacement of specific genetic material.
CRISPR-Cas9 has already been used in a range of applications, including the treatment of genetic disorders such as sickle cell anemia and beta-thalassemia. In one study, researchers used CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the stem cells of a patient with sickle cell anemia, correcting the genetic mutation that causes the disease. The edited cells were then transplanted back into the patient, resulting in a reduction in symptoms and an increase in the proportion of healthy red blood cells.
Another application of gene editing technology is the prevention of genetic disorders. One example is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), a technique used during in vitro fertilization (IVF) to screen embryos for genetic disorders before they are implanted in the uterus. This technique involves removing a cell from the embryo and using gene editing tools to screen for specific genetic mutations or abnormalities. The embryos that are free from genetic abnormalities can then be selected for implantation, reducing the risk of passing on genetic disorders to future generations.
In addition to these applications, gene editing technology has also been used in the development of new therapies for a range of diseases. One example is CAR-T cell therapy, which involves genetically modifying a patient’s immune cells to attack cancer cells. This technique involves using gene editing tools to modify the T cells, a type of immune cell, to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) that target cancer cells. The modified cells are then infused back into the patient, where they can seek out and destroy cancer cells.
Despite the many potential benefits of gene editing technology, there are also ethical concerns surrounding its use. One of the main concerns is the potential for unintended consequences or off-target effects. While CRISPR-Cas9 is highly precise, there is still a risk of unintended changes to the genome, which could have unforeseen consequences for the individual or their offspring. There is also concern around the potential for genetic modification of embryos, which raises questions around the ethics of “designer babies” and the potential for widening inequalities.
In addition to ethical concerns, there are also regulatory challenges surrounding the use of gene editing technology. In some countries, there are strict regulations governing the use of gene editing tools, particularly in the context of embryo editing. This has led to a patchwork of regulations around the world, which can be confusing and difficult to navigate for researchers and clinicians.
In conclusion, gene editing technology has the potential to revolutionize the field of genetics and provide new possibilities for disease treatment and prevention. From the treatment of genetic disorders to the prevention of genetic abnormalities in embryos, gene editing tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 offer precise manipulation of genetic material. However, there are ethical and regulatory concerns that must be addressed to ensure that gene editing technology is used safely and responsibly. As research in this area continues, it is important to strike a balance between the potential benefits and the risks and ethical concerns.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Advancements in gene editing technology
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!