A Virtual Museum Visit
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Topic: A Virtual Museum VisitPaper details:
Select one work of Egyptian art from the collection. Provide title, date, original location if known, and link. What was the function of the work? What drew you to it? What is the narrative depicted on the Greek Belly-Amphora (Storage Jar) of 550/540 BCE? What were jars like this used for? The Roman collection has a Statue of Aphrodite. What was the function of such copies? In what context was Fra Angelico’s Anthony Abbot seen by viewers?
Compare Botticelli’s Virgin and Child with an Angel and Agnolo Bronzino or Follower’s Virgin and Child with the Young St. John the Baptist. Name two ways each work is characteristic of their respective style (Early Renaissance and Mannerist). Compare Colyn de Coter’s Virgin and Child Crowned by Angels with Vincenzo Frediani’s Adoration of the Christ Child (Italian). Name three major differences between these Northern and Southern Renaissance works. How does Nicolas Poussin’s Landscape with Saint John on Patmos reveal classicism? In what ways does Francisco de Zurbaran’s The Crucifixion display the influence of Caravaggio?
[This is one of my favorite works in the museum. It. Is. HUGE.] How does Jacob van Ruisdael’s Landscape with the Ruins of the Castle of Egmond glorify the Dutch landscape and suggest the struggle for independence? Give two possibilities for the relationship between the figures in Gerard Terborch’s The Music Lesson. Answer Francois Boucher’s question: Are They Thinking about the Grape? Why or why not? Name two ways this work is Rococo in style. Name two ways that Manet’s Beggar with a Duffel Coat and Beggar with Oysters are Realist in style. Why does Seurat’s Sunday on La Grande Jatte look the way it does? What technique has the artist used?
What feel was he trying to evoke? For Monet, what was the meaning of his series, Stacks of Wheat? Browse the museum website and find a portrait. (A portrait is an image of a known person, not a saint or a god/goddess.) Provide title, artist, date, and stable URL for the image. Then in a couple of sentences, describe the ways in which the sitter’s identity is depicted. What detail about the image suggests what value or virtue for the depicted person? (Gender, status, occupation, etc.) Browse a bit more and find a work from a non-European culture. This could be African, Chinese, Aztec, etc. Which object did you pick? Provide the title, artist, date, culture, and URL and share what you learned about the work and why you picked it. Look around the website a little bit more.
What is your favorite work that you found in the museum and why? Be sure to provide title, artist, date, and URL. Tell me about your experience using the AIC website. Was it easy to navigate? What recommendations would you have for them? What did you think about your experience accessing art online during a global pandemic instead of in person? Is it effective or not? Do you feel you really engaged with the works of art? Why or why not? Extra Credit: Find three works that depict the same saint. Name them (artist, title, date.) Who is the saint, and how do you know (besides just the title!)? That is, what iconography tips you off? Provide the links for each work too.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!