A Navigation Solution Using a MEMS IMU
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
A Navigation Solution Using a MEMS IMU
Question:
Curious if all UUVs try to not surface to reveal GPS data or is that specific only to military UUVs? Is there no similarity of autonomy between the two?
Maritime unmanned systems take the form of autonomous underwater vehicles. These are developed with specifications to perform unique tasks with the incorporation of different technologically diverse components that work together to suit the underwater environment. Unlike the other types of unmanned systems, autonomous underwater vehicles operate in an entirely different environment which makes the use of GPS tracking unreliable based on the fact that radio waves do not entirely penetrate the water surface. For the control of their navigation, dead reckoning is employed as a standard navigation alternative to surfacing and revealing the GPS position. Dead reckoning is a technique that tries to predict the point in the navigation of an autonomous underwater vehicle based on speed, time and the set navigation course (Kepper IV, Claus & Kinsey, 2018). The navigation control can further be improved where baseline transponders at the seafloor are installed. The Inertial Navigation System that is fixed onboard the autonomous underwater vehicle facilitates dead reckoning.
The unmanned ground vehicle, on the other hand, contacts the ground and provides a variety of navigation controls. An autonomous unmanned ground vehicle uses the artificial intelligence it is fed with to make its own decisions from interpretations sourced as a result of its sensors. Where control in their navigation is needed, they can be remotely operated through an interface by a human operator with onboard visual aids with the example of a digital video camera (Malon et al., 2018). The human operator will have a joystick, a combination of computer programs to convert logic to operation signals, or even, based on the diversity of the supported input architecture, he can even have voice command. The unmanned ground vehicle mostly utilizes the GPS location functionality to identify its geographical predisposition, a functionality that is precise and less complex when compared to the dead reckoning feature for the autonomous underwater vehicle. It can also receive navigational instructions from unmanned aerial vehicles such as drones which take detailed pictures of the terrain and transmit these images to the unmanned ground vehicle for further analysis. This is where the artificial intelligence that is fed to the autonomous ground vehicle is applied.
Based on the environment that an unmanned vehicle traverses, its features are specified, which highly define the design attributes to be realized. An autonomous underwater vehicle will have pressure-related characteristics to counter the adverse pressure changes it is subjected to as it traverses different depths. The unmanned ground vehicle, on the other hand, will employ indestructible airless tires to efficiently navigate through the varieties of harsh terrain. Regardless, these features play vital roles in the realization of the specific functions that an unmanned vehicle is designed to accomplish. The diversity of the technical requirements that compose the various hardware and software components is dependent on the operational objective that the unmanned vehicle is to achieve.
References
Kepper IV, J. H., Claus, B. C., & Kinsey, J. C. (2018). A Navigation Solution Using a MEMS IMU, Model-Based Dead-Reckoning, and One-Way-Travel-Time Acoustic Range Measurements for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.
Malon, K., Łopatka, J., Rykala, Ł., & Łopatka, M. (2018, October). Accuracy Analysis of UWB Based Tracking System for Unmanned Ground Vehicles. In 2018 New Trends in Signal Processing (NTSP) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!