IFSM303 Authentic Data Collection Assessment Task
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
IFSM303 Authentic Data Collection Assessment Task
User Needs Research Data Collection and Analysis Report…
IFSM303 Task: Authentic Assessment
For this course, a series of projects have been identified as an authentic assessment that all students will complete in lieu of a final exam.
Conducting user needs research, establishing user requirements and creating a conceptual framework for subsequent design is often novel and always a complex endeavor, so emphasizing these professionally relevant skills as an authentic learning outcome means providing enough specificity in assignment descriptions and other means of learning support to guide students to initial mastery of these three progressively related skill sets.
Together, the three projects (comprising 50% of the course grade) described in this AA document mirror the sequential and progressive nature of how this human factors work is typically performed in a professional setting.
Project 1: User Needs Research Data Collection and Analysis Report (total 20% final grade weighting)
For the first project and the remaining two related projects, a target area for “redesign” of existing software and/or Web site should be identified by the instructor and stated in the assignment description for each of the three projects. The main criteria for this choice should be that the interface is freely visible and accessible by users and the subjects that are chosen for this assignment need research. An example of an interface that meets these criteria is the Conferences area of UMUC Tycho course management system. An added advantage of this type of choice for target area is that all learners and the instructor are already familiar with it.
Purposive Subject Selection (10% of project 1 grade):
Select a minimum of five adults (and one alternate) for subsequent informed consent recruitment. Subjects should be varied in their demographics (gender, age, prior knowledge of computers and
software in general and specifically in terms of the target redesign area).
Provide documentation (minimum 250 words) listing these characteristics of each subject as well as the collective variance inherent in the subjects as a sample (group). Describe each subject using a pseudonym, such as subject 1, 2, 3, etc. or using male or female first names that are not actual subject names.
Human Subjects Informed Consent (10% of project 1 grade):
Provide documentation (minimum 250 words) of Human Subjects Informed Consent wording to be used in formal recruitment of subjects.
Elements of this wording should address the following criteria:
Provide overview information of nature and purpose of the user needs research
Provide overview information of nature of data collection (initial questionnaire and follow-up interview)
Characterize participation in study as voluntary with the right to withdraw at any time without use of previous data collected.
Characterize use of individually collected data as confidential (no personally identifiable information shared).
Characterize use of data for analysis as summary or aggregate in nature (not individualized).
Characterize use of individually collected data as temporary and its records destroyed after summaries are created.
Characterize use of data for reporting as limited to presentation in a report for a college course (assignment).
Questionnaire Creation and Administration (20% of project 1 grade):
Provide a sample of an originally created questionnaire addressing the following criteria:
Create a brief introduction describing the basic nature and purpose of the user needs research.
Create a minimum of three question items that address various user demographics (age range, gender, and type and extent of prior computer and software use, especially in software similar or same as the target interface area.
Create a minimum of six question items that address various aspects of user needs for the target interface area for redesign.
Create an open-ended question item at end of questionnaire prompting for additional comments on perceived user needs and suggestions for improvement of the target interface area
Interface Tutorial Creation and Administration (10% of project 1 grade):
For subjects with little or no prior experience with the specific target interface area that is the focus of redesign, a tutorial should be created and administered to focus on its use (prior to questionnaire data collection).
Provide documentation (minimum 250 words) of an originally created interface tutorial (for the target interface area) addressing the following criteria:
Create a brief introduction describing the basic nature and purpose of the user needs research interface tutorial.
Create sequential instructions that explain each step of the tutorial to the subject.
Follow-up Interview Creation and Administration (20% of project 1 grade):
Provide documentation of questions (minimum of five open-ended question items) posed to two of the (five) original subjects that provide elaboration, clarification, and probing of topics (themes of user needs) identified in their individual questionnaire responses.
User Needs Data Analysis and Reporting (30% of project 1 grade):
Provide documentation (minimum 500 words) of a summary of responses from the initial questionnaire (for all five subjects) and follow-up interviews (for two of the five subjects) that identify and characterize the nature of expressed user needs (in the aggregate) for the target interface area.
The Project 1 report document must be submitted via the Assignments Folder. For compatibility across software applications and systems, the project assignment response should be saved in a word processor in the standard file format of Rich Text Format (.rtf). In Microsoft Word, you select the Save As option on the File menu and then select Rich Text Format (.rtf) from the drop down menu on the “Save as Type” field.
Project Assignment submissions are allowed any time prior to the deadlines (stated in the course schedule part of the Syllabus). The date and time of any submission will be determined by the recorded online system date/time stamping that occurs whenever an online data transmission is performed. A policy for late submissions with initial point reduction penalty can be determined by individual instructors.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!