Worksheet on Soil Physical Properties
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Geomorphology and Soils (GG282)
Part One of GG282 Laboratory Exercise Two
Soil and Surficial Material Physical Properties
Organic Carbon Content, Moisture Content, and Atterberg Limits (Consistency)
Before your next lab, complete and submit this lab’s exercise (GG282 Lab 2 Part 1 Data.xlsx).
Submit your.xlsx file to the DropBox account for YOUR lab area!
IntroductionStudents reviewed the process for determining moisture content in a sediment (soil) sample during the lab time and completed tests to determine the plastic and liquid limits (Atterberg Limits). Students will also watch a demonstration of how to determine the organic content of a soil sample.
We’ll compute the moisture and organic content of the samples, as well as the liquid and plastic limits, this week in the lab. We’ll also begin the process of pooling our experiment’s data. This project will be continued at the start of next week’s lab.
Results
Atterberg Limits Moisture Contents
In the room, there were three samples labeled Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3. Three trials for the liquid limit determination and three trials for the plastic limit determination were conducted for each sample in each lab section.
Moisture Content (Task 1)
Each student would have access to a data table with sample weights. Normally, we would combine the data from your lab part. Sample ID, dry tin weights, and wet sample and tin weights would have all been weighed on your table. You would take the samples from your lab section’s drying oven and weigh the dry samples and tins on the balance. Following that, you would have inserted the data into the data table. Calculate the dry sample weight and moisture weight for each sample. For each sample, you will determine the moisture content in percentages. To complete the table, enter all of these values. On the data sheets, show one complete set of calculations.
(6 points)
Task 2: Calculating the Liquid Limit
The moisture content of the sample (soil) at which 25 blows (drops) on the Casagrande apparatus close a grove over a distance of 13 mm is known as the liquid limit (one-half inch). In actuality, preparing a sample with just the right moisture level such that the groove closes in exactly 25 blows is extremely tough.
The liquid limit can be determined using one of two methods based on the type of data collected with the Casagrande apparatus:
An empirically generated equation is used to find the liquid limit (see below). This equation is based on data from hundreds of fine-textured samples (L.E.J Norman (1959), The One-Point Method of Determining the Value of the Liquid Limit of a Soil, Geotechnique, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 18).
The moisture content at n blows is used to compute the liquid limit (LL) (wn). The moisture content of the soil is measured as a percentage of the weight of the oven-dried soil. When you calculate the liquid limit, you’ll get a value that’s also a moisture content in percent.
We(N/25)0.121 = LL
Where
LL stands for Liquid Limit in Percentage.
We = Percentage of the sample’s water content at n blows
N is the total number of blows required to shut the grove in the test.
To utilize this expression, use the number of blows (N) to close the groove in the test and the moisture content of the sample from the liquid limit test (Wn).
In one experiment, the grove closed over the time interval and a sample was taken. The sample had a moisture level of 35% and a total of 21 blows to seal the grove. The sample’s liquid limit is 34.3 percent, according to the expression above.
Determine the liquid limit for each of the three trials using the one-point technique for the three samples used in your lab section. Fill in the blanks in the attached table. One set of calculations is displayed.
Task 3: Establishing a Plastic Limit
The moisture content at which a soil or silt begins to behave like a plastic material is known as the plastic limit. In response to an applied stress, a material that exhibits plastic behavior undergoes a non-reversible change in shape (strain). Fine-grained soils and sediments are semi-solid at moisture levels just below the plastic limit. The plastic limit is expressed as a percentage of moisture content. We used the method provided in the last handout to determine the plastic limit.
When a soil sample is weighed, dried, then re-weighed at its plastic limit, the weight loss of the soil sample equals the moisture lost during drying. By dividing the weight of the moisture loss proportionally to the mass of the oven-dried soil, the moisture content at the plastic limit can be estimated as a percentage.
Task 4: Calculating the Plasticity Index
The Plasticity Index (PI) or Plasticity Number is the numerical difference between the liquid and plastic moisture content:
PI = Moisture Content at Liquid Limit – Moisture Content at Plastic LimitOrganic Content (Task 5)
The organic content was determined using five soil samples. In each lab segment, one or two trials were done for each sample; each sample received eight trials over the course of the week. The information has been recorded into a spreadsheet that may be found on XDrive.
Open the spreadsheet with the loss on ignition data that you downloaded from MLS.
(GG282 Lab 2 LOI Data 2020.xlsx). Examine how the data in the spreadsheet is organized. The following calculation is used to compute the proportion of organic matter in each sample:
Organic Substances ( percent )
= (pre-combustion soil weight) – (post-combustion soil weight) / 100
(pre-combustion soil weight)
Examine the data in the existing columns in the spreadsheet, and then:
1) Calculate the soil pre-combustion weight for each trial.
2) Calculate the weight of organic matter lost during burning for each trial.
3) Calculate the soil post-combustion weight for each trial.
4) Calculate the organic matter percentage for each trial.
5) For each sample, calculate the average organic matter percentage.
Examine the outcomes. There are five samples in all, each with eight or nine trials. Is there anything that stands out as an outlier among the trials? To find these trials, search for values that are significantly different from the rest of the sample.
Determine the mean organic matter content as a percentage for each sample, then repeat the computations after eliminating any abnormal values. Demonstrate a single example of your work.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!