Work of The Human Genome Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Work of The Human Genome Project
Tune in to news programs regularly and you will probably become aware of the considerable debate over the patenting of genes. This controversy is fueled largely by the work of the Human Genome Project and the biotechnology industry.
Despite numerous meetings and publications on the subject, Congress has not used U.S. patent laws to shape a policy that allows maximum innovation from biotech inventions. The first gene patents, issued in the 1970s, were granted for genes whose full nucleotide sequence was known; the protein product was also known, and the protein’s function was well understood. Since that time, genome projects have produced new ways of finding genes.
Short sequences, only 25 to 30 nucleotides in length, called expressed sequence tags (ESTs) can be used to identify genes but provide no information about the entire gene, the product, the function of the product, or its association with any genetic disorder. Using gene-hunting software, researchers can take a short sequence of DNA and use it to search gene databases, turning up theoretical information about the sequence.
For example, the sequence may belong to a gene encoding a plasma membrane protein or may be similar to one in yeast that is involved in cell–cell signaling. At the present time, there are tens of thousands of ESTs and gene-hunting patent applications fi led at the U.S. Patent Office. The unresolved question at the moment is how much you need to know about a gene and its usefulness to
file a patent application. How should utility be defined? The diagnosis of disease certainly meets the
definition of utility. Many discoveries have identified disease-causing genes, such as those for cystic
fibrosis, fragile-X syndrome, breast cancer, colon cancer, and obesity. Many of these discoveries have patents based on diagnostic utility. An increasing number of patent applications are being fi led for discoveries of hereditary-disease-causing genes. These discoveries frequently lack immediate use for practical therapy, however, because gene discovery does not always include knowledge of gene function or a plan for developing a disease therapy.
The impact of a decision about gene patents is enormous. Pharmaceutical and biotech companies have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in identifying genes to be used in developing diagnostic tests and drugs. Without patents, it is unlikely that companies will invest in developing these drugs.
However, patenting genes can lead to royalty-based gene testing accompanied by exorbitant fees and licensing arrangements requiring payment to companies that own the patent on a particular gene. A case now before the courts about the patents on two genes used to test for breast cancer may determine much of the future of patented genes. As the results of the Human Genome Project redefine health care, these issues take on importance for everyone.
- What is a patent?
- Is patenting a gene different from patenting another product or invention? Should patents be awarded for genes under any circumstances? Explain.
- If patenting genes were not allowed, do you think it would slow gene research in a significant way
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!