Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
SUBJECTIVE
Will, a 12‐year‐old male, was referred to the school‐based health center (SBHC) at the request of his mother for a red right eye, noticed this morning upon awakening. Will reports waking up this morning with his right eyelid “stuck together like glue.” He reports washing his face and eyes with warm water, allowing him to open his eye. He noticed his eye was “a little red,” but did not report any pain or itch. He has had to wipe his eye a few times since washing his face, as “yellow stuff keeps coming out.” Will reports wearing glasses daily and has never worn contact lenses. He is experiencing no visual disturbances and denies blurriness and double vision. Will’s mother was contacted by the SBHC to provide confirmation of history and further details. His mother denies sick contacts at home, but Will’s cousin, whose house he slept at over the weekend, was given “eye drops” last week by his primary care provider.
Birth history: Will was born full term. His birth weight was 8 lbs 5 oz and birth length was 20 in.
Past medical history: Will has seasonal allergies, which are exacerbated every fall, that are well con-trolled on daily allergy medication. He has myopia and has been wearing glasses since age 6. He had an appendectomy 2 years ago when he was 10 years old. He has multiple visits to the SBHC for acute, unrelated presentations. He has no further significant history, hospitalizations, or surgeries.
Social history: Will lives with his mother, father, and older sister in a single‐family house. Will is in the seventh grade and plays on the school lacrosse team. He wants to one day be a professional lacrosse player. He is also the team manager for the town’s local hockey team, and enjoys art and music in his spare time. Will has multiple friends at school and a few close friendships.
Diet: Will eats 3 meals a day and reports a normal appetite. He consumes a varied diet of fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and protein sources.
Elimination: Denies difficulty going to the bathroom. Reports regular bowel patterns.
Sleep: Sleeps an average of 8 hours per night. Denies nighttime awakenings, snoring, and restlessness.
Family medical history: Will’s family history is positive for heart disease on his father’s side; his father had a myocardial infarction several years ago. His father may have high blood pressure,
but he is not sure. Will denies family history of cancer and or diabetes. His paternal and maternal grandparents are alive and well. He is unsure of his grandparent’s medical history.
Medications: 10 mg Zyrtec daily, Naphcon allergy eye drops as needed, daily multivitamin.
Allergies: Seasonal. No medication allergies reported. No food allergies reported.
OBJECTIVE
General: Male presenting in no acute distress, well hydrated, conversational and appropriate with provider.
Vital signs: Height: 68 in; weight: 135 lbs; BMI: 20.5; BP: 116/70; HR: 75; RR: 16.
Skin: Skin is clear with no rashes noted. Small scar is noted at right lower abdominal quadrant s/p appendectomy. Skin is warm and dry.
HEENT: On examination, right eye is mildly injected, with thick, yellow discharge draining from inner canthus. Dried, yellow crusting is noted across lower lid. Upon cleansing the canthus,
discharge reappears spontaneously throughout duration of exam. Pupils are equal and round, reactive to light, with accommodation showing normal pupillary reflex. Visual acuity is 20/20 on Snellen test with corrective lenses. Red reflex is noted and optic discs are without hemorrhage.
Head is normocephalic and atraumatic. Tympanic membranes are clear, intact, with landmarks and cone of light visualized, bilaterally. Nasal turbinates are pale, swollen, and with mild clear discharge. Nasal septum is vertically aligned with no report of pain or discomfort upon palpation of frontal and maxillary sinuses. Oral pharynx is clear with no erythema noted. Tonsils +2 of 4 with no exudate or erythema. Posterior pharynx has minimal post nasal drainage and mild cobbling.
Neck: Supple with full range of motion in all directions. No cervical lymphadenopathy.
Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm. S1/S2 auscultated with no murmur, clicks, rubs, gallops.
Equal +2 carotid and radial pulse bilaterally.
Respiratory: Clear to auscultation. No wheezes, rhonchi, rales noted. Good air exchange.
Abdomen: Soft, nontender, nondistended, normal active bowel sounds in all 4 quadrants.
Genitourinary: Deferred.
Neurologic: Alert and oriented. Cranial nerves grossly intact. Good eye contact. Gait normal.
Uvula rises midline and symmetrically.
CRITICAL THINKING
What are the top three differential diagnoses in this case and why?
What are the diagnostic tests required in this case and why?
What is the plan of treatment?
Are there any standardized guidelines that should be used to treat this case? If so, what are they?
What are the plans for follow‐up care and referral?
Are there any special examination and or treatment considerations that may affect this case?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!