Whistleblowing and corporate whistleblowers
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Whistleblowing and corporate whistleblowers
Whistleblowing refers to the act of exposing wrongdoing or unethical behavior within an organization, typically by an employee or insider who becomes aware of such activities. It involves the disclosure of information that is considered to be in the public interest, aiming to bring attention to illegal activities, fraud, corruption, or other forms of misconduct.
Corporate whistleblowers are individuals who expose misconduct or illegal practices within a corporation or business entity. They may be employees, former employees, contractors, or even stakeholders who have access to privileged information. Whistleblowers play a crucial role in uncovering wrongdoing that may otherwise go unnoticed, and their actions can have significant impacts on organizations, society, and the individuals involved.
The decision to blow the whistle is often a difficult one for corporate whistleblowers. They may face a range of challenges and potential consequences, including retaliation, loss of employment, damage to their reputation, legal battles, and personal hardships. Despite these risks, whistleblowers come forward driven by a sense of moral responsibility, a desire for justice, or a commitment to upholding the law and protecting the public interest.
Whistleblowers have historically played key roles in exposing major corporate scandals and fraudulent activities. Examples include Mark Whitacre, who exposed price-fixing practices at the Archer Daniels Midland Company, and Sherron Watkins, who brought attention to accounting irregularities at Enron. Their actions triggered investigations, legal actions, and regulatory reforms, leading to increased transparency and accountability within the corporate world.
In recent years, whistleblowing has gained greater attention and recognition due to high-profile cases involving multinational corporations and government agencies. These cases have highlighted the importance of whistleblower protections and the need for robust mechanisms to encourage and support individuals who expose wrongdoing.
Many countries have implemented laws and regulations to protect whistleblowers. These laws vary in scope and effectiveness, but they generally aim to shield whistleblowers from retaliation and provide avenues for reporting misconduct. Whistleblower protection laws often include provisions for anonymous reporting, safeguards against unfair dismissal or harassment, and incentives such as financial rewards or immunity from prosecution.
One notable example is the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in the United States, which established the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Whistleblower Program. This program provides monetary rewards and protection to individuals who report violations of securities laws. The European Union also enacted the Whistleblower Protection Directive in 2019, requiring member states to establish comprehensive whistleblower protection frameworks.
The impact of whistleblowing extends beyond individual cases. It can lead to systemic changes within organizations and industries, improving corporate governance, ethical standards, and regulatory enforcement. Whistleblower disclosures can prompt internal investigations, strengthen compliance mechanisms, and compel companies to revise their policies and practices to prevent future misconduct.
However, the act of whistleblowing is not without controversy. Some argue that whistleblowers may breach confidentiality agreements, harm their organizations’ reputation, or create distrust within the workplace. Others question the motivations and credibility of whistleblowers, suggesting that they may be driven by personal agendas or seek financial gain. Balancing the interests of whistleblowers, organizations, and the public is an ongoing challenge that requires careful consideration.
In conclusion, whistleblowing is a vital process for exposing misconduct and promoting transparency and accountability within corporations. Corporate whistleblowers play a critical role in uncovering wrongdoing and contributing to the greater public good. Effective whistleblower protections and support mechanisms are essential to encourage individuals to come forward and ensure that their actions lead to meaningful change.
Whistleblowing and corporate whistleblowers
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!