When Teachers go Bad Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
When Teachers go Bad Assignment
“The educator, believing in the worth and dignity of each human being, recognizes the supreme importance of the pursuit of truth, devotion to excellence, and the nurture of democratic principles” (Code of Ethics of the Tennessee Education Association, Preamble). The Teachers Code of Ethics is one of the highly revered codes made to follow by every teachers, and should not be violated at all cost. Sometimes, there tends to be those who do not follow it, and from there rises different kinds of problems that poses a threat to Education. Teachers are the foundation of every student’s education; however misbehavior, social misconduct, and criminal acts from bad teachers can change a student’s idea of schooling into a nightmare.
How can a teacher be called a bad teacher and why is it not safe for students to be lead and governed by these so-called “bad teachers”? There are numerous ways for teachers to be considered as bad and we are not just talking about committing crimes like sexual molestation, robbery, drug pushing and other things that we commonly see on news. A teacher’s discipline can also be considered as a tool to use in knowing if they are a role model teacher of the society or a bad example for students not to follow in their future career. “Ineffective faculty are a drag on colleagues and hold back the development of students” (‘Eric Hanushek, “Does Tenure Protect Bad Teachers or Good Schools?”). Clearly, teachers have a lingering effect on the effectiveness of an educational institution over their students.
There are so many issues of teacher failing their profession and their students: misbehavior, social misconduct, and criminal acts and of them are not good for the students. News like “”A 24-year-old high school math teacher is accused of having sexual contact with two students in her classroom and exchanging inappropriate texts and nude photos” (McCormack 1); a Pennsylvania university dismissed professor fired and charged of sex assault (Buxton 1) and many others found and seen in the daily news. This are bad not just because they distraught students and parents alike, but also because they contaminate and corrupt the aim and honor of education. One important factor too is that education’s main purpose is to teach, and to make the students learn. If the teachers who are responsible for teaching is not just and corrupt, then we fear of what the students will learn from them.
In her study, Sara Banfield gave four kinds of teachers and those are: “Good Teacher” (67), “Incompetent Teacher” (71), “Indolent Teacher” (74) and “Offensive Teacher” (78). In her studies, she found out that “there has been a significant difference in academic self-efficacy between good teachers and indolent teachers” (46). She stated that good teachers “asked for examples, encouraged participation of students, and sought feedback from students, thus engaging the students during the lecture” (46). Therefore, it is only evident that there can be a good correlation between the behaviors of teachers to their student’s learning experiences.
All in all, the teachers are supposed to be a role model of the society. A teacher is a representation of every academic institution. They are expected to do what their profession requires and to uphold their duty as a teacher in all times that is possible. That is why we find it unacceptable whenever we hear them misbehaving, and worse committing serious, unforgivable crime. Teachers must be vigilant and watchful of their fellow teachers. For society to remain trustful with what the education system can offer to all our students, teachers must be the first to be the role model of good in all times.
Works Cited
Buxton, Ryan. “Fired Professor Robert Ammon Jr. Rightfully Terminated After Sexual Harassment, Court Finds.” The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 11 June 2013. Web. 23 June 2014. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/11/professor-robert-ammon-jr-fired-sexual-harassment_n_3421700.html>.
“Code of Ethics.” TEA Teachers. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 June 2014. <http://www.teateachers.org/teaching-tennessee/active-teachers/code-ethics>.
Hanushek, Eric. “Does Tenure Protect Bad Teachers or Good Schools?.” The New York Times. N.p., 11 June 2014. Web. 23 June 2014. <http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/06/11/does-tenure-protect-bad-teachers-or-good-schools?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Ar>.
McCormack, Simon. “Teacher Meredith Powell Allegedly Had Sex With Students.” The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 10 Feb. 2014. Web. 23 June 2014. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/10/teacher-meredith-powell_n_4760537.html>.
Banfield, Sara R. “How do college/university Teacher Misbehaviors Influence Student Cognitive Learning, Academic Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Curiosity?” Order No. 3407571 West Virginia University, 2009. Ann Arbor: ProQuest. Web. 23 June 2014.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!